Do you think this is true?
>>8114407
I mean, the source of this picture is shitty, but to hell with authorial intent - this is to a degree true. Although the "beware" part is dumb, just write "take notice", it sounds like a veiled threat. Beware the quiet bookworm, it's not just books in his backpack.
>>8114407
Considering how much I masturbate, and how many books I read, then yes.
X D
D
I am a virgin NEET ascetic currently at stage IV of the Norwood Scale and an addict to hardcore pornography for the best part of ten years, and what I've noticed in my reading of hundreds of blog posts, reddit comments and message board discussions between women or at least frequented by women is that "slutty" women, aka women who are perceived to be very sexual and whose characters are associated with sex and eroticism tend to be relatively predictable and unadventurous in terms of open-mindedness when it comes to having sex and personal preferences associated with the act itself, largely, in my opinion, because their characters and perspectives are overwhelmingly the result of a culture which promotes the sexual experience while continuing to shame and ostrichsize those who may be perceived as "weird" or "obsessed" about something that is not conspicuously advertised as something one is allowed to be obsessed with, while those girls considered "shy" or "studious" etc tend to be extremely perverted, in terms of their appreciation of unconventional sexual acts, I mean I myself have viewed hundreds of amateur of videos wherein the female protagonists resembled the kind of girls that I mistakenly perhaps in retrospect identified as naive, innocent, childlike in their desire merely for romantic affection and so on during my four years in college (during which time I attracted but failed to ask out a single one of these girls, for reasons my psychologist and I have spent the past 1.5 years attempting to work out) but who were actually likely to be the exact kind of girls who enjoyed things like golden showers, analingus (given), "rape-play", daddy roleplay, choking, spitting, hitting, spanking and roleplay in which she was the "unwitting" victim and / or captor of a malevolent, aggressive, callous male using her body for to appease his sadistic ambitions.
I am a goddamn sexual tyrannosaurus with plennnnty of kinks
>>8114420
>tfw the thing that gets me the most about this pasta is that he thinks piss and rimjobs are "hardcore pornography"
>>8114435
Into le trash xd
Not true about having dirty minds because that would be degeneracy.
>>8114416
>tfw an avid reader
>>8114420
theres also the type you can find on fetlife where she will lick your asshole on the third date but it all will seem forced, but in worst kinda way, like its a fashion statement for her, but for herself, not as a sign of submission or whatever
>>8114420
High-IQ, high openness women are the most sexually adventurous in my experience. I don't even bother flirting with girls who haven't gone to a top college anymore because if I go to their rooms I know I'll find some dismal scene with empty wine bottles out and "inspirational" quotes on the wall and vanilla sex followed by uncomfortable posing as if we're cuddling.
Give me that biologist/dancer/athlete from MIT any day and throw away your Kama Sutra.
>having sex with straight people
Idiots
>>8114482
Sorry for interupting the thread, I'm just intrested.
Am I correct in my assumption that having sex with virgin girls is terrible? My sample size is two, but I never had sex with someone who I hadn't deflowered, so I can't really compare. They seem to be very inactive, awkward, and have this awful brand of naiviete that seems forced. And, for reasons I can't imagine, their genital hygiene is horrible.
Either I don't get the virgin cult, or I don't get sex at all.
>>8114501
What do you mean by "their genital hygiene is horrible? t.virgin
>>8114501
Stop having sex with straight women, you idiot.
>>8114501
MUH PURITY is a meme pushed by male virgins who think doing it with someone clueless will be amazng and theyll be extra tight and all that jazz
It's a myth; absurd and childish and to desire it is nothing more than to show how clueless you are
>>8114515
Roastie detected.
Laughing my ass off at you right now. About to email your post to my mate.
>>8114506
Both shaved before our first time, which is idiotic, because pubic region is vulnerable - ok, you can shave, but compensate for the damage with some aftershave. Shaving should be regular and well in adance of any sexual acts, because skin is covered with abrasions, cuts and pimples.
Both, although with the first one the case was worst, do not get how to clean your vagina properly. If you are an uncircumsised male, do you pull back the foreskin while taking a bath? of course, becase most mucus acculumates there. Why following the same logic is impossible for virgin woman until they are told their vagina smells, and not pleasently, but like a caramelized rotting pig?
>>8114507
I've considered it, considering the storge, but the synthesis into agape is impossible without eros.
>>8114515
Yes; tightness also. How is it a plus, exactly? When I masturbate, I don't try to choke my penis to death, why would I want in sex? Extreme pressure just makes me go limp after a while.
>>8114501
Only done a virgin once, but even girls with only one prior sexual experience aren't going to give you the kind of ride you'd get from someone with a better idea of what she wants (and what you probably want) and how to get there. It's like dancing. It might be cute and touching to teach a girl how to dance, but it's not going to be a good dance.
The obsession with virginity makes sense if sex is in the context of marriage only, or if all it's highly likely to lead to conception and you want that to happen with your seed, but the cat's sort of out of the bag on those. Nowadays it's mostly autists who worry they'll fail to measure up to a girl who's more experienced than them.
>>8114407
Yes and no. Bookworms also tend to self-shame and repress their sexualities, especially when not on the internet.
Anybody else feel like their taste in porn is distinct from their taste in sex? I've never actually been laid so maybe this will change if/when I do, but when it comes to porn I can't even get off to regular sex. I'm particularly into voyeurism, transwomen, piss, and hentai. However when it comes to actual sex all I really desire is traditional missionary intercourse. I do like that voyeur/exhibitionist dynamic as well, but irl I wouldn't want to fuck a transgirl and being pissed on would gross me out.
>>8114581
Same here, but it's simply because the more you fap (once a day for me) the more complicated your fetishes get. Abstain a week and you'll jerk it to a vanilla picture of boobs from the 1950's.
I guess it will change when or if I get laid.I don't even want sex that much, only cuddles.
>>8114407
>Us readers, huh?
>>8114581
That makes a lot of sence; I don't think watching porn is escapism, you don't imagine yourself as the male/female - it is more about looking at something you would never dare to do and don't really want to. In my opinion, VR porn will never be popular for that reason, and erotic fiction is on the other hand popular because it provides distance which porn sometimes fails to do.
Voyeurism in porn IS escapism, of course, but any porn has an implied voyeur which you identify yourself as.
>>8114435
it is
>le I am such a bookworm nerd xD
>>8114590
That makes sense, but personally I've never really been into vanilla porn. Though come to think of it, my first exposure to pornography was hentai, which quickly led me to futa and other fetish stuff, so maybe it's just the early impression.
Another semi-interesting note is that the porn I watch is almost exclusively of white girls, but irl I find myself more attracted to Latina and Asian girls.
>>8114599
Interesting analysis and I think it holds truth.
Are you aware of any essays or full-length works that examine pornography? I'd like to read something along those lines.
>>8114407
>dirtier minds
some of them. not this one.
>they notice more
I notice particular things that they don't think about—especially implications of ideology or moral principles. But I miss a lot else. My attention is intense and minute, but I'm not always noticing the things I ought to be noticing. And sometimes I'm absorbed in thinking about something other than what's happening around me—current events, politics, art, theology, "humanity", myself, etc. None of which makes me more alert.
There's a half-truth in that image, but that's all, I think. But that's just about myself. I can't speak for all readers.
not literature
