I have a philosophical theory and method that may destroy all knowledge of which we know.
How do I get it out there, without it being stolen and with some help?
(I'm being entirely serious.)
Take your medicine
>>8113968
I'll tell you a sure way to do it. It's quite easy, it's a service that lets you post whater the hell it is you want to post in an article fashion, but it'll cost you $5 U.S. and it'll advertise it to as many Facebook and Blogspot Sceince and philosophy related users and groups. (i'm being enitrely serious)
But first you gotta post a picture of your self with a shoe on your head.
YouTube
>>8113968
Print out a copy of your thesis and mail it to yourself. Then submit it to journals and magazines. You could even make a blog or post it here for "peer review."
>>8113968
Post it here, and if it survives /lit/ without being torn to shreds you may be on to something.
But I honestly doubt that it will remain in tact for longer than a few minutes.
>>8113968
How much philosophy have you read OP? Destroying certainty has been the preoccupation of philosophers from the pre-Socratics to the Post-Structuralists. What makes you so sure that you came up with something new? There are already quite a few convincing radical skeptic arguments, including quite a few put forward by contemporary authors from many traditions.
Politeness aside, shouldn't you finish High School before becoming a philosopher?
>capable of ending philosophy
>incapable of getting published
wew lads
Destroying knowledge (of which we know - isn't that a tautology??) really isn't that hard - it's been done countless times throughout the history of philosophy. The trouble is reassembeling a belief in a coherent sense of "knowledge-in-spite-of".
I think you should just post it and be shredded.
>>8113968
hint: it's a lame refutation of the truth of logic
>inb4 u cant no nuffin
>>8116010
Prove you can know anything
>>8116016
I know that 1+1=2
>>8116016
define can, know, and anything
>>8116023
How do you know that?
>>8113968
>proprietary philosophy
>>8116023
axioms are stated, not known
>>8116031
I was taught that in school. Now it resides encoded in my long-term memory, occasionally returning to my working memory when I'm using this knowledge.
>>8113968
Boy, I sure hope its another one of those trolley problems.
>>8113968
Honestly I laughed out loud. Thanks.
>>8116060
1+1=2 is a theorem, not an axiom.
