>>8092174
I've never read their Julius Caesar, but the way Signet constructs their annotations is nice. Plus, they usually include possible source texts Shakespeare drew from.

Intros are kinda trash though, all pretty generic information about the Bard in general and not the text at hand.

yo, you either need notes or you don't, and if you need notes you can find them anywhere online

shakespeare wrote in english so you have that going for you already

>>8092308
hey man what can you tell me about this edition? would you say its better than dover thrift?

>>8092312
as far as i'm concerned, as long as the source text is presented intact fuck an edition the rest is up to you to read about or not read about yknowhatimsayin

I rather like Signet, their annotations are rather concise, and well organized. I don't own a signet of Caesar, but I do own theirs on a handful of other shakespeare works from them.

In the end it don't matter though, there's much analysis you can read up on online now a days

>>8092319
This guy.