/lit/ needs a philosophy meme trilogy. I suggest these 3 since they would work.
>>8006862
Not talked about enough
Maybe Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Critique of Pure Reason, The Ego and Its Own
>>8006862
I like those guys but Nietzsche is clearly /lit/'s resident meme philosopher
>>8006872
This.
>>8006875
The hell you say.
While we're at it, I think the Laozi should be on there.
>>8006872
How about.
The Ego and Its Own by Max Stirner.
Sex and Character by Otto Weininger.
Fanged Noumena by Nick Land.
Stirner is customary, of course.
Then, Thus Spoke Zarathustra has a good meme potential.
>>8006862
You can't force a meme. The only philosophical books mentioned enough to be meme-worthy are The Ego and Its Own, and possibly Aurelius' Meditations or The Myth of Sisyphus
Phenomenology of Spirit, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Being and Time
>>8006903
>Can't force a meme
>The Ego and Its Own
>>8006910
It's already a meme.
It was never forced.
>>8006923
That is how it become a meme.
Nietzsche
Stirner
Zizek
>>8007021
>Zizek
No good meme books tho.
>>8007044
this. maybe replace Heidegger with Schopy or Nietzsche bc nobody really reads Nazi boy
Liggottis meme book
(-380) Plato: "Republic"
(-340) Aristotle: "Nicomachean Ethics"
(400) Augustine: "Confessions"
(1274) Aquinas: "Summa Theologica"
(1620) Bacon: "Novum Organum"
(1641) Descartes: "Meditations on First Philosophy"
(1651) Hobbes: "Leviathan"
(1677) Spinoza: "Ethics, Demonstrated in Geometrical Order"
(1689) Locke: "Two Treatises of Government"
(1690) Locke: "An Essay Concerning Human Understanding"
(1704) Leibniz: "New Essays on Human Understanding"
(1710) Berkeley: "A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge"
(1739) Hume: "A Treatise of Human Nature"
(1748) Hume: "An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding"
(1762) Rousseau: "The Social Contract"
(1781) Kant: "Critique of Pure Reason"
(1785) Kant: "Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals"
(1818) Schopenhauer: "The World as Will and Representation"
(1859) Mill: "On Liberty"
(1863) Mill: "Utilitarianism"
(1874) Sidgwick: "The Methods of Ethics"
(1884) Frege: "The Foundations of Arithmetic"
(1886) Nietzsche: "Beyond Good and Evil"
(1887) Nietzsche: "On the Genealogy of Morality"
(1890) James: "The Principles of Psychology"
(1892) Frege: "On Sense and Reference"
(1899) Peirce: "Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce"
(1903) Moore: "Principia Ethica"
(1907) James: "Pragmatism"
(1919) Russell: "Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy"
(1922) Wittgenstein: "Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus"
(1928) Carnap: "The Logical Structure of the World"
(1934) Popper: "The Logic of Scientific Discovery"
(1936) Ayer: "Language, Truth and Logic"
(1949) Ryle: "The Concept of Mind"
(1953) Wittgenstein: "Philosophical Investigations"
(1955) Goodman: "Fact, Fiction, and Forecast"
(1960) Quine: "Word and Object"
(1962) Kuhn: "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions"
(1962) Austin: "How to Do Things with Words"
(1963) Popper: "Conjectures and Refutations"
(1965) Hempel: "Aspects of Scientific Explanation"
(1971) Rawls: "A Theory of Justice"
(1972) Kripke: "Naming and Necessity"
(1974) Nozick: "Anarchy, State and Utopia"
(1975) Fodor: "The Language of Thought"
(1975) Putnam: "Mind, Language and Reality"
(1979) Nagel: "Mortal Questions"
(1979) Rorty: "Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature"
(1980) Davidson: "Essays on Actions and Events"
(1981) Putnam: "Reason, Truth, and History"
(1981) Dretske: "Knowledge and the Flow of Information"
(1981) Nozick: "Philosophical Explanations"
(1982) Evans: "Varieties of Reference"
(1983) Lewis: "Philosophical Papers"
(1983) Searle: "Intentionality"
(1984) Parfit: "Reasons and Persons"
(1984) MacIntyre: "After Virtue"
(1985) Williams: "Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy"
(1986) Nagel: "The View From Nowhere"
(1986) Goldman: "Epistemology and Cognition"
(1993) Singer: "Practical Ethics"
(2000) Williamson: "Knowledge and Its Limits"
(2008) Quine: "Quintessence"
>>8007091
bit heavy on post 1960's philosophy, eh?
>>8007107
Analytics, much like scientists, place a heavier emphasis on recent philosophy because they view it as a linear practice, one of constant refinement and improvement. Kant might as well be Copernicus!
>>8007107
That's like saying the neuroscience curriculum is heavy on post 1960s neuroscience.
Don't listen to these guys OP, it's a creat trilogy
Only thing I'd change is placing Capitalism and Schizophrenia (or just A Thousand Plateaus) instead of Cioran, but either way it's fine really
>>8007066
Why not?
>no Philosophical Investigations
>>8007172
Why would they?
>>8007196
Because they could? He's influential? Idk why not?
>>8007204
He was a charlatan obscurantist who wrote gibberish for a living.
>>8007122
Neuroscience and Philosophy are very different fields, with very different subjects of study.
>>8006862
How would one go about actually understanding land?What are Bataille's most important works and what are the other necessary readings?
>>8006887
This.
>>8007251
>How would one go about actually understanding land?
Literally impossible. Read his blog, though, to start.
http://www.xenosystems.net/
>>8007286
I thought his blog was more about his politics and not his philosophy?
>>8007301
His philosophy shines through clear as day. Also, it's basically wrong to say Land "has politics." The interpretation of Xenosystems as being political completely misunderstands what's going on... and explains all the confusion people have about him.
>>8007027
Sure, but the man is a living meme.
>Discipline and Punish
>Phenomenology of Spirit
>literally anything Zizek
>>8007091
I'm not well versed in philosophy, so I'm saving this for choices with regard to future pick-ups. Thank you.
>>8007251
You can read Thirst for Annihilation fine if you are just a little familiar with Bataille. Story of the Eye and Literature and Evil would be fine.
No Dugin?
4th Political Theory is pure meme material
![ob_93d0e2_max-stirner-800x1000[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/IB0kXxy.jpg "ob_93d0e2_max-stirner-800x1000[1].jpg")
>>8006862
> Philosophy meme trilogy
> Not Stirner there
