is it as good as the movie?
I loved when ever someone was narrating. it sounded so beautiful.
>>8000292
do you live in central New Jersey? just wondering
>>8000296
no I live in Toronto. why. do I talk retarded?
>>8000292
some of the plot points are the same
and character names
but any poetic nonsense is fortunately absent from the book
the book is notably superior to the flick
>>8000716
i doubt it considering that malick is the greatest living filmmaker
>>8000292
It was shit, truly.
>>8000336
I thought trolls lived under bridges.
>>8000742
>malick is the greatest living filmmaker
Malick wanted to film three hours of the wind blowing the grass but a bunch of World War II re-enactors came along and intruded and ruined his vision of the film.
>>8000765
hi-fi high five friend. I giggled.
>>8000765
>>8000716
oh man are you serious. no poetic bits? fuck I purchased this book for that alone. haha fail.
book is literally a masterpiece. I've never read anything like it. blow by blow action packed narrative from multiple different characters during a heated battle. It's really amazing.
>>8000336
>why. do I talk retarded?
no but because i live there and my buddy who posts here just watched the movie
>>8000749
The butterfly guy hated it, so you know it's a fantastic book.
>>8000986
I read from here to eternity and that was wicked too. I'll give this a spin next. just reading the sound and the fury. I wish it was poetic though.
>>8000742
the movie was great. I think it should have won the academy award that year for best film, not saving private faggot. the last scene where he raises his rifle in slo mo
