that picture is stupid

>>7989328
I'm pretty sure this leaves out a lot of movements

>>7989398
Why

>>7989431
it's oversimplified as fuck. it has literally 3 authors for the renaissance period

>>7989431
Has Dostoevsky but not Tolstoy

File: gd-history-timeline.jpg (665 KB, 4583x1346) Image search: [Google]

665 KB, 4583x1346

>>7989328
/gd/ here.

File: 1451496901022.png (992 KB, 2780x1524) Image search: [Google]

992 KB, 2780x1524

>>7989328

>>7989431
Melville and Whitman aren't romanticists.

>>7989476
surprisingly accurate pic

>>7989476
That's definitely around when I turned ironic, but I've probably been post- or meta-ironic since 2011 or so

>>7989476
>>7989500
Though tbf the post-ironic era is just an extension of the ironic era

Longcat is long

>>7989480
Forgive me if I'm wrong but I thought Melville was a 'Dark Romanticist' whatever that means

>>7989518
It means he had jungle fever

>>7989518
Never heard of the term, where'd you find it? He fits in a lot more smugly with Emerson's Transcendentalists than an old world tradition like Romanticism.

>>7989525
I found it on wikipedia 2bh

>>7989431
>no Joyce

>>7989431
Postmodernism started in 1965 right after modernism ended.

>>7989525
They all sort of fit under a hoaky umbrella of American neo classicism imo.

>>7989328
its like you can literally see that slow disconnect from the spirit in this graph

>>7989525
Dark Romanticism is obviously New World Romanticism, you're welcome.