http://www.academia.edu/12780933/_Those_Obscure_Objects_of_Desire_Andrew_Cole_on_the_Uses_and_Abuses_of_Object-Oriented_Ontology_and_Speculative_Realism._
Discuss.
Also: What's next to make philosophy great again?
Grahack Hackman
>>7884596
I'm writing a book on the relationship among religion, evolutionary psychology, sociology, society, culture, politics, and well-being. It probably won't get finished or released, but it really should. It would radically change the way that people understand and treat religion, challenge current ideas about psychology and sociology, and make seemingly bizzare human antics such as love for music and the acts of ISIS totally relatable and comprehensible. But I probably won't finish it because doing theosophy and taking is seriously gives you a mindset that is terribly alienating and disatisfactory.
>>7884596
What makes this debate so boring is that it lacks any relevance outside of philosophy - and inside philosophy I would add, if that discipline didn't consist of angry circlejerking since 200 years or so.
>>7884929
It's is (somewhat) influential in the art world. I think this influence will grow...
Your 200 years comment is bs
>>7884929
Nobody discusses so-called "object-oriented ontology" inside Philosophy. It's nonsense spouted by pseudo-intellectual poseurs.
>>7885465
coming from an undergrad
>>7885447
>It's is (somewhat) influential in the art world.
JFMSU senpai
I thought these people were all just memeing Nick Land
