>Plain Lo in the morning. Lola in slacks. Lois Lane.
What did he mean by this?
If that was actually in the movie then I can only assume it was some random reference thrown in for literally no reason
>>Lolita? I have no idea why though.
>>7862342
I think he's hinting that he's aware of the relationship to superman. maybe like her and superman have to maintain a prof. image for work (slacks = full name), just lois in closed doors
>>7862615
Yes, it was. Completely out of no where, probably the writers trying to make Lex look like he's smart, even though 75% of the audience won't even get the reference.
Lo as in Low as in short.
Most of us know it by heart so you aren't tricking us
He was acting pretentious trying to throw in high culture references.
Plus it could have been a nod to this guy who is in the movie.
I was waiting for the Lolita quote 'cause I heard about it, but never noticed it.
>>7863179
It means Lex is a pedo and was infantilizing Lois in his sick, villainous mind.
>>7863222
>Plus it could have been a nod to this guy who is in the movie.
which irons probably hated. i don't see how a nod toward a nabokov/kubrick role he was in and was proud of in the middle of fucking "batman vs. superman" could've possibly pleased the man.
>>7863935
>kubrick
>>7863935
>kubrick
>>7863953
Did someone say LATE?
