Is there a right way to understand symbolism or does it all just boil down to your own interpretation? Is there a way to learn to understand the proper meaning behind the author?
i don't know how to read sorry
Obviously no objective right way.
What I do is try going into it with as little expectation as possible. See what it means to me to extent i'm willing to try.
Then check other interpretations to see if they match or add anything to how I feel. Maybe reread if I think there is much I missed.
I actually never do this but it's what I think I would do if I could be bothered to make the effort
Symbolism is mostly interpretation, but there are dictionaries of symbols around. People like Freud also schematized the use of symbols and some of the authors they influenced keep to those specific meanings.
You can interpret whatever as long as it has convincing evidence and a purpose.
>>7849749
Not gonna lie, I think everything pretty much comes down to sex, if you think about it.
>>7849749
1. context in the story
2. compare to other stories or culture
>>7849767
How does Deal or No Deal come down to sex
>>7849767
Freud go back to bed
Just read more and read analysis. It's a skill.
Schopenhauer's advice is good.
Basically:
Read
Reflect
Re-read
>>7849767
>>Not gonna lie, I think everything pretty much comes down to sex, if you think about it.
false, it comes down to despair for men. only women are able to crave sex for sex itself
>>7849749
Symbolism is fucking dumb anyways. Don't worry about it.
>>7849809
You are aware that literature is an inherently symbolic medium, right? What do you think happens between the reader and the book when engaged in reading?
>>7849809
Based albatros
>>7850142
This. How can people on /lit/ reject symbolism? The whole fucking point of books is that they consist of signs, which means nothing by themselves, but only in a symbolic relation.
>>7849749
nah
>>7850164
Literally retarded post
