Which are good online anarchist libraries?
toys r us
>>7836384
interestinfg
http://abahlali.org/files/Graeber.pdf
http://monoskop.org/images/6/6e/Vaneigem_Raoul_The_Revolution_of_Everyday_Life.pdf
>>7836388
I want books, not toys.
And they don't sell anarchist stuff there.
>>7836384
>>7836412
Reddit is not a library...
>>7836408
These PDFs are not libraries...
THEY'RE TRASHING OUR RIGHTS
>>7836419
/r/anarchism actually has a good wiki with lots of public domain stuff though
H A C KT H EP L A N E T
A
C
K
T
H
E
P
L
A
N
E
T
>>7836384
http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/index.html
https://theanarchistlibrary.org
>>7837499
Can you please then link me this wiki?
>>7837525
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3CKgkyc7Qo
>>7837503
I alredy know this, and this is a shitty library. The 1st book I searched for was editted by marxists...
>>7837502
Thanks, now I can read "God and the State"... But there is only this 1 book of Bakunin there...
The Infinite Jest (by David Foster Wallace)
>>7837528
I understand now.
But I searched my trash can and there are no ebooks there...
>>7837534
>I alredy know this, and this is a shitty library. The 1st book I searched for was editted by marxists...
Which book was that? ive been using it for years without much trouble.
Left 'anarchism' is statist sjw bullshit. check this out instead
https://mises.org/library
>>7837503
I contacted The Anarchist Library, by e-mail, more than 3 weeks ago and got no response. I suppose they are ignoring me on intention.
Why?
There's other way I can use to contact them? Should I?
>>7837687
Appears that you are recommending a book.
I asked for a library...
http://flag.blackened.net
i've mostly looked at their EZLN stuff (the mexican revolutionary group), but there's a ton here
>>7838189
and in the vein of mexican anarchists, read more of the Magón brothers. Ricardo, Enrique, and Jesus Flores Magón
>>7838200
and in honor of my dubs, one more thing. David Graeber's Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology. as far as academic circles go, he's sort of lukewarm with a lot of people in academia. he's definitely mildly autistic. but he's one of the most original and intelligent theorists in probably any academic discipline today.
fragments of an anarchist anthropology david graeber
http://abahlali.org/files/Graeber.pdf
>>7837525
>Can you please then link me this wiki?
You are too lazy for anarchism.
>>7837748
Fuck off...
>>7836384
Try this OP.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/index.htm
Then, search "anarchism" on that page.
STIRNER
>>7838215
FUCK YOU
I don't want to see these edited books. I want the real texts. These there are sabotaged.
>>7838208
I have way too many things to do...
>>7837748
>anarchism
>statism
Hello, /pol/. I see you have no clue as always.
>>7838223
H-how?
>>7838224
like monitor this 4chan thread? fuck off guy.
>>7838238
I'm monitoring many threads.
This isn't the most important.
https://www.nobordersbutourskulls.org
There's seriously underground and transgressive publications on this website; I'm surprised it's even legal in Western states. You can find virtually any subcategory of anarchist thought here: Islamic fundamentalism, secession techniques, anarcha-feminism, syndicalism, post-capitalist technology, hyper-capitalism, propaganda techniques, post-neurobiology, authoritarian egalitarianism, social construction, pedophilia, violent social deconstruction (terrorism), post-legal societies
Be forewarned, it's extremely NSFW/NSFL
>>7836410
toys are inherently anarchist
>>7838189
I friend of mine really likes EZLN.
>>7836384
how about this annotated bibliography on anarchism?
http://pastebin.com/BLzGwSUQ
use bookzz.org to download books free, or libgen
>>7838291
i really like them too, if only for being an interesting group vis a vis historical positioning.
for one thing there's the invoking of emiliano zapata. beyond that though, they sort of fit into a broader (though very underpublicized) flow of radicals from mexico city to the central american wars of the 1980s.
for a couple reasons -- mexico, despite being right next to the USA, kept a completely independent foreign policy throughout the cold war years. not only decrying US-backed dictators in places like Chile, but accepting tons of Southern Cone refugees (including Bolaño, to make this post more /lit/ worthy), supporting the Sandinistas in the Nicaragua, and keeping the western hemisphere's largest USSR embassy until the fall of the wall. so lots of revolutionary sentiment was transiting between Mexico City and Central America -- Chiapas is obviously right in the middle of those, and these very post-modern intellectuals/radicals often inadvertantely linked in with a great deal of indigenous organizing that the Archbishop of San Cristobal de las Casas had done throughout the 60s and 70s.
though i think their downfall though had a lot to do with that historical positioning and USSR shit as well. in the wake of the collapse of the soviet union, they basically absorbed the whole hope of the global Left, from 3rd wave feminism to how Socialist states should be reimagined, and beyond -- which their movement wasn't prepared to do. so i think through the late 90s and early 2000s, they fucked up in really emphasising the indigenous element too heavily, and were transforming poor people's politics (which the Left ultimately is) into indigenous politics, and that a little too constrictive for the whole worldwide Left to stay on board with.
as for why marcos stepped down, probably because not only is he fucking old and sad now for not having really achieved the revolution that once looked so promising, the perception of the EZLN in many ways came to be about him -- someone who is not indigenous, who is University educated, who is not from Chiapas/doesnt work the land there -- and it stood at odds with how the EZLN really "should" be proceeding.
>>7836384
>https://libcom.org/library
>>7837525
http://www.reddit.com/r/anarchism
> visit anarchist library
> no shelves, books are piled on the floor at random
> each book is hand-written in an invented language using an invented alphabet
> librarian refuses to acknowledge your existence
>>7838208
>You are too lazy for anarchism.
Anarchism is easily the laziest political ideology though. You just have to sit on your ass and complain and then boom, you're an anarchist.
>>7836384
https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchy101/comments/rbxjm/an_anarchist_canon/
>>7838437
>You just have to sit on your ass and complain and then boom, you're an anarchist.
Anarchism=action. You're mistaking anarchism with sjw tumblerinas faggots.
If you're a non-Stirnerite anarchist I honestly think you should kill yourself.
>>7838223
No they are not you fucking hick. Marxist.org is just an archive.
>>7838425
Witty
>>7838189
Why the topics in this site are "male" and "female"?
>>7838217
This is not a library.
>>7838232
Marxists and anarchists are not friends.
Marxists would sabotage anarchist texts.
>>7838270
Why do you think that?
>>7838252
>it's extremely NSFW
???
>>7838311
Bibliography isn't a library.
>>7838353
>Bolaño
The only Bolaño I know is from El Chavo del Ocho.
I suppose isn't this Bolaño, tough...
>>7840096
>Marxists and anarchists are not friends.
There are plenty of Marxists who aren't Maoists or Stalinists
>>7838415
I accessed, there's no library in this wiki.
>>7840245
But they are not anarchists!
It's of their interest to mess with rival movements.
>>7837748
>Ancaps
>>7840261
I can't understand this image.
>>7840261
Stirner is far closer to ancaps than the marxist anarchists who whine about social justice and direct democracy.
>>7840318
Except he openly dismisses private property in The Ego and It's Own
>>7838223
Dude, I've been involved with local anarchist movements for the better part of the last 10 years and there really isn't that much rivalry between libsocs (or the majority of marxists) and anarchists.
Leninists and their ilk fuck shit up, but even then things go (sort of) smoothly
>>7840096
You are a fucking idiot. Why can you not just read both and not cling to you dumb identity as to who you are on a political spectrum?
Why would anyone sabotage texts on a leftist archive? Surely you could google that and get articles about why marxist.org or whatever is horrible. You are the type of spastic that makes the left criticism seems uncritical and dogmatic.
>>7840330
He really doesn't. In fact one of the points he uses to attack the socialists is that they want to abolish private property. From the start of the "Social Liberalism" section
>This is the second robbery of the “personal” in the interest of “humanity.” Neither command nor property is left to the individual; the State took the former, society the latter.
Also:
>Political liberalism abolished the inequality of masters and servants: it made people masterless, anarchic. The master was now removed from the individual, the “egoist,” to become a ghost — the law or the State. Social liberalism abolishes the inequality of possession, of the poor and rich, and makes people possessionless or propertyless. Property is withdrawn from the individual and surrendered to ghostly society. Humane liberalism makes people godless, atheistic. Therefore the individual’s God, “My God,” must be put an end to. Now masterlessness is indeed at the same time freedom from service, possessionlessness at the same time freedom from care, and godlessness at the same time freedom from prejudice: for with the master the servant falls away; with possession, the care about it; with the firmly-rooted God, prejudice. But, since the master rises again as State, the servants appears again as subject; since possession becomes the property of society, care is begotten anew as labor; and, since God as Man becomes a prejudice, there arises a new faith, faith in humanity or liberty. For the individual’s God the God of all, viz., “Man,” is now exalted; “for it is the highest thing in us all to be man.” But, as nobody can become entirely what the idea “man” imports, Man remains to the individual a lofty other world, an unattained supreme being, a God. But at the same time this is the “true God,” because he is fully adequate to us — to wit, our own “self”; we ourselves, but separated from us and lifted above us.
>>7840696
And even clearer in case you missed the point:
>According to the Communists’ opinion the commune should be proprietor. On the contrary, I am proprietor, and I only come to an understanding with others about my property. [...] Property, therefore, should not and cannot be abolished
>>7840696
ancap ideas of property are spooky as fuck. NAP is spook extraordinaire. i would say Stirner preaches class struggle. but not in the abstract name of humanity or the society etc but naked self interest. what is the union of egoists but a collective? each disposing of property as he wills yet none respecting the others if it goes against their interests. private property in the class society sense is untenable in stirner's conception of an unspooked union
>>7838437
or a 4chan poster
>>7838252
what is this? it sounds interesting but I can't find any such website, did you type it right?
does anyone know anywhere else with really transgressive/out there publications? I like reading weird stuff like that.
>>7838252
The page does not load!
>>7838361
Good, I found "God and the State" in this site, in two versions (1910 and 1970). But, they're PDF. Is this acceptable for an ebook?
>>7838425
WTF?
>>7841055
please tell me you didn't really respond to that shitpost
>>7840807
>i would say Stirner preaches class struggle
>>7840807
Stirner would be against the destruction of white countries and white culture by collectivist 3rd world hordes
