You're
all
a
bunch
of
cunts.
Prove it
There's something about that image of Wittgenstein that I love.
>>7805548
Wittgenstein is a hack fraud guilty of perpretating the very fraudulent obscurantism he accused other philosophers of doing.
>>7805553
is that bill nye
>>7805548
You're not wrong.
A good majority of us are, and like I implied, I agree, but would you like to elaborate on that thought or no?
>>7805690
Bertrand Russel I think.
>>7805703
Yes.
>>7805702
i'm bored and every reply to a thread i make excites me a little, no matter the content
>>7805710
@me lol wtbqh f a m s m h
No, but really, I'm the same way when I start a thread. Hope you find something to entertain you better, anon. c:
>>7805548
1.You're
2.all
2.1..a
3..bunch
3.1.of
3.2.cunts.
4.u
FTFY
>>7805732
jerboa ruined swans
>>7805734
Cheeky.
pussy= wet for ludwig
>>7807065
sorry, he prefers ass.
>>7805646
the fact that he merges with the background
wew lads this sure is the high era of lit right here.
>The world is everything that is the case.
what did he mean by this?
>>7808831
He just forgot the comma.
>The world is everything, that is the case.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qs6rYmlP2oM
>>7809327
The Tractarian ontology does not consist of sets, but facts. There is no indication whatsoever what he means by "the world" too. But it sure as hell isn't referring to the "set of all sets" for Wittgenstein vehemently argued against set theory.
>>7809353
What do people and toilets have in common?
>>7809528
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFkoStQtcnQ
>>7805548
maybe if we accept the metaphysical notion of language denoting ideas and objects then in the conditions of our language game we could all be considered a bunch of cunts`
