Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
2016-03-10 04:45:38 Post No. 7794140
[Report]
Image search:
[Google]
Anonymous
2016-03-10 04:45:38
Post No. 7794140
[Report]
For those of you who are unfamiliar with how problematization works, here is what it is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problematization
First of all, I will not outright say problmetization is useless in of itself, rather I will say it is a bad thing insofar as what it is intended to do. The method was developed by Foucault as a *replacement* for polemic, and that right there is an issue, because problematization does not fulfill the function of polemic, and in this capacity it is seriously flawed on two counts.
1. It does not actually argue against the *truth* of a statement, rather it is attacks the motive of a statement.
2. It automatically makes all that is traditional "problematic' simply for being traditional. I consider this a grave error. Has anyone here read Burke? Then you understand why this is so dangerous.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_OLom4lvdA
If anyone had a rebuttal to my issues, please post it.
