Are we going to have a 2016 "top 100 books of all time" poll?
>>7744176
Probably not in February though.
>>7744176
Until december.
Probably.
/lit/ 2016 BOOK POWER RANKINGS
1. The Bible
.
.
.
POWER GAP
.
.
.
9001. Infinite Jest
Considering 2015's list didn't even place Mason & Dixon, I'd say you should just copy/paste the url to r/books recommended reading list because clearly /lit/'s populace has devolved into the lowest common denominator - barely literate and not well-read.
>>7744197
>no one likes my meme author baaah
I think we should do more than just top 3 this time. It's kinda dumb when books with 2 votes make the list
>>7744176
Please don't. Please fucking don't. It serves no beneficial purpose. The last one caused +1 million views on imgur and a colossal influx of idiots, which I fear /lit/ will never recover from.
You're basically advocating the suicide of /lit/. Just fucking don't.
Having a need for a poll is for middlebrow trash anyway.
Fucking don't, I'm serious.
>>7744197
I recall Mason&Dixon had more votes than much of the bottom inclusions, but the 2014 or 2015 guy didn't count it in, along with several other titles.
let me read a few more /lit/core books first so i can shit on them while the poll goes on
>>7744176
Please no
>>7744176
We should just make a decoy list to trigger /r/books
>the Bible #1
>Catcher in the Rye #2
>The Great Gatsby #3
>Hitchhiker's guide to the Galaxy both #41 and #43
>The Joys of Gay Sex #99
>The God Delusion #100
>1984,Dune,Brave New World, LotR, Rand, anything Asimov or Dick all not on the list
>>7744176
>help me get famous on redshit/imgur guys
>>7745299
This