is this graph accurate?
>>7742934
No dude that's way off. Someone clearly exploited the security weaknesses of that Windows XP and/or that Java install and hacked some seriously misleading info into there.
>>7742934
It is. When it comes to influence, no one has escaped Kant in the last two centuries. Connections and names are lacking, but what the image shows is accurate.
>>7742966
underrated post
Hegel should be more notable on the graph.
Eh.I know that Kant is influential but can I skip him if I suspect he's going to bore me to death?
Can I understand Hegel without Kant?
>>7742934
>is this graph accurate?
It's obviously a digraph you pleb.
>>7743099
>Can I understand Hegel without Kant?
Not really.
>>7742977
K thx
