Well received.
You can leave now.
are you afraid people wont like you if you enjoy it without the /lit/ seal of approval?
's good
>>7723357
one of the few books that /lit/ seems to unanimously like.
Very good. Like if Tarantino wrote literature.
>>7723804
>Like if Tarantino wrote literature
into the trash it goes
Black author conspiracy?
Should we be worried?
>>7723838
It's like Tarantino without the periodical awkwardness that comes from trying too hard. The dialogue is tight, the violence is horrific, but not in a stylised way. It's a gritty story that you can tell the author feels very passionate towards.
>>7723804
>unanimously
Damn. Backlash when?
>>7723820
Only about the publishing industry's lack of originality. I suppose it's a decent enough cover concept, though.
>>7723820
>>7723357
Germans are in on it, too
I don't think /lit/ has even read 700 pages of a book that came out in 2014.
I read it, I thought it wasn't the best book but it was so fun I didn't care. If anyone asked me if they should read it I'd give the go ahead
>>7723804
>Like if Tarantino wrote literature.
That's probably the most off-putting description you can give a book other than directly saying it's shit.
everyone I know hates it. seems shitty
