How do I do it like Derrida?
He has so many works I don't know where to start. Where does he propose alternate translations of Greek classics?
>>7718928
Do it like Derrida
>>7718970
How?
>>7718928
Start with the Greeks.
>>7719024
How?
DERRIDA IS A HACK
>>7719060
How?
>>7719113
How?
>>7719114
How?
>>7719129
How?
>>7718928
If you want to do like Derrida, first you must make a porno with Hegel and Heidegger.
You don't have to like Derrida.
You don't have to like Zizek, Benjamin, Lacan, Jung or any theory. It's okay.
>>7719286
I'm down
>>7719290
How?
this thread is derrida incarnate and equal in significance
>>7719707
How?
>>7719707
Derrida is significant.
>>7719707
how?
If, as Derrida says, there is no "outside the text", ie
>words on a page are not representations of transcendent spoken words
>written statements do not point to ideal and objective realities
>the existence of a story in printed form does not mean that the story will still exist if 100 years on all books telling that story are gone
Then does that mean that anything you say is fundamentally disconnected from reality, and hence that telling an untruth is the same as telling a truth? Philosophically speaking.
>>7718928
You haven't to.
I hate Derrida with passion.
>>7721338
You're assuming truth means correspondence between a statement and an objective reality. You can have other conceptions of truth, which preserve truth but get rid of "objective reality". Read Heidegger on aletheia.
>>7718928
(Don't) Make a porno about Hegel or Heidegger, especially not both of them.
>>7721345
Why?
>>7718928
Structure Sign and Play
Différance
Signature Event Context
Of Grammatology
In that order
