>>7718221

>>7715150
Pic related

>>7718616
this honestly, murakami is terrible

There's a reason Borges is referred to as "the Argentinian Murakami", and it's not because his predecessor is bad.

>>7718627
>Borges is referred to as "the Argentinian Murakami"

>>7718221

I read Norwegian Wood and I enjoyed it. It's basically YA, but whatever, it was fun.

>>7718627

What

should i start with Kafka On The Shore?

>>7718627
nigger, who said that? the fuck.

>>7718878
>>7718649
you got trolled
>>7718638
at least this guy greentexted it

>>7718221
Recently finished "Colorless Tsukuru Tazaki" and thought it was one of the worst books I'd read in a while.

>>7718221
I can understand why a lot of /lit/ don't like him, but, I think his books are very easy and comfortable to read; the stories themselves are alright too.

>>7718672
I liked The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle more than Kafka On The Shore

>>7719019
My library doesn't have that, but I can order it

Murakami's short stories are FAR better than any of his novels. Even his essays are better than his novels.

I have liked Wind Up Bird Chronicles and 1Q84(first one I read by him actually and loved it but be warned, a lot don't like it). I was not a fan of Norwegian Wood.

>>7718221
I think he's great. /lit/ is pretty divided on murakami. read for yourself and decide.

start with Norwegian wood for more realistic

kafka on the shore for surrealistic

he won't blow your mind. he's just a FUN author. he has a ray chandler-esque detective story vibe that keeps you hooked. his English translations have the prose of ray carver but not as minimal. the cadence and pacing are there in spades though. I like how succinct he is when he does talk about life in general too.

again all the things I like about him are reasons why others may not. READ FOR YOURSELF, LAZY SHIT.