>>7714535
I've always preferred librarything

goodreads was just a scheme by a jew to get a bunch of dummies to write a bunch of book reviews for free and then sell it all to amazon for a small fortune, basically a judaic shakedown built on the free labor of naive nerds

>>7714546
So...opensource for profit.

>>7714596
it's not opensource, try to copy content from goodreads and see how fast u get sued...


>Lastly, AllThingsD's Kara Swisher actually talked to some sources and asked them how much Amazon paid for Goodreads, which raised almost $3 million from angel investors and True Ventures. They told her the real number was $150 million.


so how does it feel to know u worked for free for a guy worth 100+ million dollars? lol peasant ass nigga, then again we all making free content for that fucking jap piece of shit

>>7714539
Librarything is gas, but I don’t think OP is gonna prefer the interface more lol.

Librarything is nice because it doesn’t feel like normal social media; it isn’t screaming #brand #engagement all day long. It’s a shame most books have next to 0 reviews.

>>7714640
https://www.librarything.com/work/174272/reviews
https://www.librarything.com/work/10334533/reviews
https://www.librarything.com/work/29896/reviews
very solid community, real people

>>7714851
I was being hyperbolic lol. There are very few reviews on more obscure texts (e.g. books on Old English).