Good books against the gov
>tfw not at your computer so you can't post your nice liberty snake memes
Civil Disobedience by Thoreau and anything from Tiqqun.
>>7708896
A Marxist cheering on Toussaint L'ouverture and making apologetics for revolutionary murder from Robespierre to Lenin. Pretty much everything anti-statists could hope for
>>7708903
I have one, family
Fuck ancaps! Go by Proudhoun and Bakunin.
>>7708896
Pretty much the NRA lovers wet dream power fantasy
Atlas Shigged.
>>7708903
I only mad this thread for the meme pic tbqh
>>7708896
Atlas Shrugged
It effectively refutes the arguments of any statist socialist collectivist shill philosophies. Also go read some Rothbard.
>anti-government
it's all shit
Reminder that anarcho-capitalism is the only true anarchy. Anything else is for bootlickers.
>>7708961
Fight me
>>7708961
I don't care if you're trolling or just retarded, you should leave. Hang out on facebook or reddit like the rest of your kind.
>>7708947
lol
>>7708961
>Implying 'anarcho'-capitalism isn't a contradiction because capitalism requires the state (needs a monopoly of power to enforce private property rights) whereas true anarchy is a stateless, hierarchy-less, socialist society
> Why do the anti-authoritarians not confine themselves to crying out against political authority, the state? All Socialists are agreed that the political state, and with it political authority, will disappear as a result of the coming social revolution, that is, that public functions will lose their political character and will be transformed into the simple administrative functions of watching over the true interests of society. But the anti-authoritarians demand that the political state be abolished at one stroke, even before the social conditions that gave birth to it have been destroyed. They demand that the first act of the social revolution shall be the abolition of authority. Have these gentlemen ever seen a revolution? A revolution is certainly the most authoritarian thing there is; it is the act whereby one part of the population imposes its will upon the other part by means of rifles, bayonets and cannon — authoritarian means, if such there be at all; and if the victorious party does not want to have fought in vain, it must maintain this rule by means of the terror which its arms inspire in the reactionists. Would the Paris Commune have lasted a single day if it had not made use of this authority of the armed people against the bourgeois? Should we not, on the contrary, reproach it for not having used it freely enough?
