>>7708383

I'm actually a big fan of that Grossman translation, anon. I enjoyed it a great deal more than the Jarvis translation, at any rate, which was how I first read it.

Find samples of each translation and pick the one that you like best.

Is the Signet Classics edition of this good?

>>7708410
Seconded. Im 500 pages into that translation and I'm really enjoying it.

>>7708383
Anyone know anything about the Walter Starkie translation? It's the one I picked up and I love it.

>>7708535
>>7708560

Starkie sounds like an interesting (translator) dude. I read Grossman's about ten years ago. It was good, but I know it could be better. Wish I had time to read-thru another version. If I did it'd be Starkie's, I guess.

>>7708383
Ormsby's considered to be a pretty good translation (plus it's public domain).
It's the one I read and I've no complaints.

Thanks guys, I'll probably get a copy of the Grossman translation^