Is this translation good or bad? It's the one I have in my house although I've heard the King James edition is best.
>>7697843
Yep, kj is best. Stick with that one
>>7697843
>>7697917
>King James is best
HAHAHA King James is in no way the best translation. I don't know much about the Good News translation.
The King James version is sketchy both in translation accuracy and ease of interpretation. Most Biblical scholars I've talked to recommend the NRSV as the most accurate translation.
Stick with the holy Qu'ran fagboy
>>7697944
also this desu senpai
>>7697944
>>7697958
No thanks, shitskins
>>7697939
>squawk squawk
>>7697939
It's not the most literal translation, but as a piece of English literature it's too good to ignore. Definitely read it. It's the version many great authors have read and have taken inspiration from for many years now. But you don't have to treat it like the only version that exists, so do read more accurate versions as well.
>>7697986
>liberal detected
>>7697992
mfw my Muslim-convert friend posts excerpts of "the qu'ran" that were obviously written in immitation of KJV to make it more palatable for white people
>>7698010
If it ain't in Arabic it ain't the Qu'ran. Tell your kaffir friend to fuck off.
