Is this set /lit/ approved?
Fitzgerald is better desu
Lattimore for Homer.
Mandelbaum for Virgil.
>>7689020
nope.
Those 3 books are shit. We always say it.
Damn, boy! Don't you read the threads here???
>>7689021
Why is Fitzgerald better, I've heard his is very similar to Fagles'?
What about Alexander Pope? Are his translations recommended?
>>7689031
They’re quite different, but Fagles is fine; particularly so if you haven’t read Homer at all.
>>7689051
P R E T T Y
R
E
T
T
Y
P O E M
O
E
M
>>7689020
Looks very nice. I have that version the illiad. I'll probably buy the other two shortly after I finish the illiad.
What are some other /lit/-approved sets?
>>7689020
>wanting approve from ponces
>same autistic fag slanders fagles translation all the time
Deckled edges are fucking stupid.
They're fine though.
>Fagles
>Fag
>>7689964
That's clearly Corey Stoll, friend.
>>7689772
>cramp
>my
>style
fagles is shit
>>7689022
Seconding.
