Who was the greatest philosopher of the 20th century?
All philosophers post bronce age were losers
Why does he wear the bandana
>>7671647
it's a do-rag and it's to maintain his cornrows
>that fit
W2c?
reminder that heidegger was a little manlet
lmao no wonder he was arendt's goy-toy
Ugh Im not reading manlet phenomenology smdh
dropped hard
not me desu.
i bet the world was a really big place for heidegger lol
step aside, phenomenologists and dialecticians
you're all faggots
I don't know about greatest but Sartre was definitely one of the coolest. Are those Bugs Bunny pictures behind him?
>>7671734
Retourne au lit.
>>7671770
Toi aussi, saleté de staliniste.
>tfw sartre will never be your granddad
how does one get the cool smoking vibe without smoking
>>7671629
Richard Montague, Noam Chomsky, Ludwig Wittgenstein.
Wittgenstein was the best though.
>>7671647
it's more a recognition of a weakness, which is that he was just kind of worried that his head was gonna explode
>>7671809
By not having to ask this question
>>7671809
drinking
dying
You're all fucking plebs
Wittgenstein, easily
Not because the 20th century was lacking but because Wittgenstein is one of the greatest philosophers of all time. Give the world consciousness a few centuries to catch up and then he'll have the title of prophet to go along with his boundless genius.
popeye
>>7671770
Shit, they might be, portrait on the left looks like Mel Blanc
How absurd
>>7673493
Yet, he will always be the second most famous person in his elementary school class.
>>7673635
Who?
>>7673493
Care to explain, since you're centuries ahead?
Best O' Da' Bunch
>>7671770 far from de Beauvoir, surely
>>7673689
It's not that I'm centuries ahead, it's that Wittgenstein's influence hasn't been felt for long enough to have sunk into the world soul
When seeing language as symbolic logic and understanding how this relates to basic set theory becomes common sense the Wittgensteinian era can begin
>>7673696
what the fuck is that shirt felix is wearing
>>7671803
satre would be the worst grandpa you know you're not getting shit for birthdays and holidays
deleuze cause of his alphabet
>>7673474
>philosopher
>ebola
what next, elliot rodger?
guattari ruined deleuze
>>7673474
yikes
>>7674414
zizekian meme. he gets their project wrong on every page it's mentioned in that book
>>7674004
>the future
>set theory
>not univalent constructive foundations
>>7671647
It's a kippah
>>7674004
>When seeing language as symbolic logic and understanding how this relates to basic set theory becomes common sense the Wittgensteinian era can begin
>“Set theory is wrong” and nonsensical (PR §174), says Wittgenstein, because it presupposes a fictitious symbolism of infinite signs (PG 469) instead of an actual symbolism with finite signs.
You're probably right, though.
>>7671629
hello, gentlemen
Max Scheler.
Definitely the most underrated.
>>7671813
Honestly, Wittgenstein? It sees to me that his best insights filled a very specific niche.
>>7676956
He revolutionised aesthetics, considering all philosophy comes from aesthetics (according to Kant) he revolutionised all of philosophy.
>>7677122
Dude, what in the flying fuck-all are you talking about? Wittgenstein's comments on aesthetics are sparse and widely dispersed, and Kant only ever claimed that the cultivation of an aesthetic sense was a desirable prerequisite to a moral education, not that it was the 'basis'of all philosophy (which is Critique).
>>7676770
when will he actually write something? all his pupils are churning out books but he just reblogs tweets about bitcoin
>>7677139
Wittgenstein is a qt, so he is best.
>>7674039
he'd hold you down and fuck you too
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_petition_against_age_of_consent_laws
>>7676956
Language-games, son.
about on par with the other posts ITT
>>7671629
Hitler
>>7671629
Ayn Rand
>>7671629
