Show me your e-books
>>7666767
I read some books too in iBooks on my phone but mostly poetry and shorter works.
But it sort of trivializes my reading for some reason. I remember my books when they're physical copies
>>7666767
What is the point of this thread?
I've got tons of e-books and I have a question. Is is really bad that I read it on my laptop(sumatra pdf) instead of having a physical copy? In terms of staring for hours at a dim laptop lcd screen and posture wise..
>>7666830
Posture is very important. You should try to find a used e-reader for around 50 bucks if you have that many e-books and buy a bookstand for posture.
>>7666827
To weed out plebs of course
>>7666827
It is a subtle recommendation thread that excludes physical copy snobs and illiterates who cannot figure out how to pirate
>>7666839
15GB for me. I'm impressed, what all is in your collection?
>>7666849
Not many more books than this guy >>7666827
But I have a large archaeology collection that kind of inflates the size. Also collections on finance and the cambridge history series.
>>7666767
>>7666854
I did wonder how you managed to have fewer books than me at ten times the size. I don't have very many pdfs, which may account for it.
>>7666858
>>7666863
>reader's digest
>cancer
>>7666849
>>7666827
Curious as to the books that you downloaded. Must, collect, more
>>7666872
I'm not sure you understand how to use greentext.
>>7666872
Ahshahahag
>>7666883
You would be better off using btdigg to grab all this shit, unless you have unlimited data
>>7666877
>>7666883
>I'm not sure you understand how to use greentext.
"Enter a single ">" before a line in your reply and it will show up green. This is supposed to indicate a quotation of someone else's post, but as no one one 4chan has any respect for petty distinctions like intellectual property, hardly anyone does this. Much more common is reductive quoting:"
I'm confused how that's not reductive quoting.
>>7666891
Thank you brather, I'm currently listening to Jean-baptised Accolay : violin concerto no.1 in a minor. You?
>>7666895
The appropriate response to him would have been
>reading readers digest
You are the cancer that is killing this board
or as a response to someone calling him cancer
>readers digest
>cancer
(implying that you have to pick one)
Your post is a defense or readers digest, or maybe I am misunderstanding and you are defending readers digest from any upcoming attacks
>>7666903
My monitors audio broke.
>>7666905
Like listening to the vibration of frogs upon gathering swimming green water which indication is great usurpery loss and that what makes the singing or teeth for teeth into a rousing groaned holes not detestable, it is intact that you must have been misunderstood agreed!
>Confessions of a Mask
Is this any good? I am about to read it and don't want to get memed
>>7666922
Yes, and even if you dont like it, its only like 120 pages anyways
>>7666905
In the aforementioned parameters of "greentexting" we were able to derive meaning from reducing the basic essence of any given statement to what its pith meant. This then I would infer to mean that one can take
>Reader's Digest
>cancer
to mean that Redear's Digest can be reduced to to cancer.
I'm confused as to why you state it designates itself as a choice of criticizing another. If used as a metaphorical device we could easily use greentext to compound on the already given statement, compounding through the reduction of what was given.
I'm not arguing what I did was the correct form, I'm merely stating that it's not wrong to delineate the core of something via greentext in a derisive way.
-Sincerely,
12 year old fuck boi, PhD
>>7666931
Wew lad
>>7666935
I can't be a pretentious cuck at a large Big Ten degree mill, might as well do it anonymously.
>>7666922
same here man. Best part is mishima san only gets better.
Didn't want to start a new thread because I bet you get these questions all the time, but what kind of e-readers are you guys using?
I'm currently interested in Amazon's paperwhite model but it's a little pricy for me and wondering if there's anything better to consider. I thought about getting a regular tablet (like one of the cheap Fire models) but from what I read it doesn't have e-ink tech and I'd like to avoid eyestrain as much as possible.
>>7666935
That cat is ugly as fuck
>>7667222
>>7667219
Search your city's classifieds (craigslist, kijiji, etc.). You can get a used Kindle/Sony/Kobo for much less. A lot of people receive e-readers as gifts, never use them, and eventually sell them for cheap. Do not get a tablet. I personally use a Sony PRS-T2.
>>7666922
he is pretty much meme writer. Themes are interesting, but prose mediocre, i doubt he would be so popular if not his meme suicide
>>7667230
This is depression fuel. Where do you live? That cat looks very unhealthy. More than the bed-sheet underneath. But i'd still meow it.
>>7667472
Earth brotha
>>7667397
Kill yourself
>>7666863
what app is that?
>>7667530
Looks like Moon+ Reader
>>7667475
that's a classic breh
