What are your literary guilty pleasure's, /lit/?
I'll go first
I actually enjoyed Cathcer in the Rye. Maybe I should reread to make sure I'm not completely misremembering it, but whatever.
I don't have any. I'm not stupid or insecure.
Catcher in the Rye is one of the greatest American novels so I don't get the problem. You think you're too cool for liking obvious classics or are you too cool to like things other people like?
>>7666021
Sometimes when I really need to center myself I read books with black and white morality because sometimes I really need the good guys to triumph over the bad.
>>7666021
there is nothing such as guilt.
>>7666021
My guiltiest pleasure is Infinite Jest. I know it's kind of out there but ever since reading Gravity's Rainbow and Lolita i've only been able to read indie unheard-of books like this. I hate that this makes me a plebian because i constantly require group validation of my taste in artwork.
i cant believe no one's said detective novels yet
>>7666067
yes
>>7667845
>infinite jest
>indie unheard-of
>>7667858
>whooshing this hard
>>7667864
oh yeah sorry
>>7666021
Very few popular books are actually bad. People have said that Huck Finn is an awful book and I assume they must be, 1: Overcompensating, or 2: Baiting.
>>7666021
thrillers
Frederick Forsyth, Nelson DeMille, Clive Cussler
detective
Michael Connelly, Dennis Lehane, James Lee Burke
Spoopy
Stephen King, Peter Straub, Clive Barker, Richard Matheson
