Is it true that one typically must write a lot of figurative garbage, before you write something of quality; something that could stand the test of time?
>>7648191
>Writing something that stands the test of time
Nearly fell for that bait
Even if you write something of quality editors are incapable of discerning whether or not it's well-written, and they'll choose a talentless hack before you to either a) fulfill their agenda, or b) posture and follow whichever trends are on the zeitgeist
Writing something that "withstands the tests of time" essentially means writing something that editors are either too scared to publish, or a story where its quality and genius go way over their heads.