Why doesn't /lit/ talk about Hungarian literature? It's honestly pretty good.
Please describe the basic outline of Hungarian literature from the 19th century onward and name and describe some major figures so that I can go read some Hungarian literature then you Hungarian fuckface
Because Hungarian anons don't shill enough for it
I shill Borges every chance I have
>>7634373
http://theculturetrip.com/europe/hungary/articles/the-outsider-within-the-ten-best-hungarian-writers/
>>7634373
http://www.britannica.com/art/Hungarian-literature
The Jobbick manifesto is bretty good tbhfam
>>7634384
Well that was underwhelming. Satantango and other stuff.
>>7634394
>and other stuff.
What else do you want
Significant lack of Kosztolanyi and Pilinszky here
>>7634384
It should have mentioned Deszo Kosztolanyi.
Kornel Esti is fucking great. Skylark is also great but Kornel Esti is a wonderful collection of stories.
>>7634433
I agree, I was surprised he wasn't on that list. Anna Edes was great too.
>>7634384
>No Banffy
Honestly though not a bad list. Banffy should be essential Hungarian literature.
>>7634376
Not that you need to. Boregs is a top five shilled writer on /lit/. Unless it's all you of course.
/lit talks about Lazslo Krasznahorkai pretty often.
