>implying I have ever read anything published after 1950

>>7618540
threads right up your alley then

What is the point of this question?

Any one whose favorite work had not yet been written by 1950 is either a very eccentric lover of the later cantos of Pound or quite simply stupid.

is that book about black men?

Honestly most books are from before the fifties.

>>7618548
no, an autistic one written by an autistic stemtard. but there is a bbc puskin-y cuck character. also horrible.

>>7618534
was there even a plot in that book? or was it just philosophical yammerings throughout?

>any book worth reading
>not published before the 50s

pick one