Paul Virilio worth reading? I've never seen him mentioned on /lit/
I am becoming more interested in the very furthest over the edge social/cultural theory, way past foucault and frankfurtschool et al.
virilio isn't in the super radical foucaultian branch of social theory, more from marshall mcluhan "i don't know what the fuck im sayiing but it sound deep to dumb ppl" school of critical studies
>>7594240
yeah, that is why i described it as 'furthest over the edge'. What i meant I guess was most crazy/outthere/nonsensical/weird. I've read enough foucault and his ilk for awhile
>>7594270
foucault is very sensible though there really isn't anything "weird" in it...
>>7594240
DING DING DING
>>7594278
yeah that is why i dont want to read the sensible guy anymore, I want to read the best nonsense
>>7594330
some freshmens and other little kids take the situationists seriously but i think its funny nonesense u cud try them
>>7594225
read vilem flusser instead
>>7594225
i've only read pic related but I remember very much enjoying it. so yeah...
deleuzeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
>>7594860
>>
oo good suggestions
or maybe all those cute semiotext(e) booklets
>>7594225
I'm amazed anyone reads this shit at all. Take a hold of your prick and let that guide you for once. If that's too vulgar, "follow your heart."
If you haven't read this, particularly Volume II, then drop all the fanciful semiotexte trendy shit and get to it.
>>7594885
is David Harvey's guided videos and book good to use to get through it?