Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /lit/ - Literature
You are currently reading a thread in /lit/ - Literature
name your'e favorite writer
name your'e favorite philosopher
Burroughs
Breton
Cobain
Cobain
Will B
Hegel
>>7582068
>your'e
nice try at creating a mem'e anon
Burroughs
Cobain
Dr. Seuss
Jaden Smith
>>7582068
Faulkner
Burroughs
>>7582068
tolstoy
schopenhauer
>>7582075
>>7582083
>tripfags
fuck off back 2 reddit m8
Faulkner
Foucault
>>7582322
>back to cuckoldry you go
>>7582345
you probably think hegel was right
Hesse
Augustine
>>7582351
You probably suck big fat socks
Actually I know you do because you're sucking mine as we speak
>>7582421
your*rekt
>>7582068
Schopenhauer
Borges
pushkin
hegel
Dostoevsky
Nietzsche
>>7582068
Shakespeare
Epictetus
Joyce Carol Oates
L Ron Hubbard
>>7582068
Dennis Cooper
Sartre
>>7582683
Kurt Cobain
Homer
Plato
>>7582068
William Gass
William Gass
pinecone
kojeve
Hegel fav. writer
Nietzsche fav. philosopher
Baudelaire
Kant
>>7584102
schopenhauer is shit tier philosophy. tolstoy is a man of god.
>>7584104
>Schopenhauer
>shit-tier
Pick one. But expand on why he's shit tier.
>>7584115
Well first of all he is backing all his stuff to other people's cool stuff. He has no metapsychical claim whatsoever. His writings are really poor in terms of literature.
He is basicly a self improvement book author.
>>7582068
borgesborges
Dostoyevsky
Aquinas
Joyce
Wittgenstein
>>7584129
Shite criticism lad
>>7582068
Nabokov
Pierce
>>7584311
My nigga
>>7582068
Pessoa
Nietzsche
>>7584129
He's more a psychologist than a systemitiser in the old philosopher/science sense which he wasn't very good at, granted, although he was clearly desperate to be. He's one of the great clear and potent literature writers though.
>>7584241
My wizard.
>>7582068
cortazar
huxley
Gaddis
Hegel
>>7582068
Shakespeare
Kant
>>7584129
>He has no metapsychical claim whatsoever
Metaphysics is dead my friend
>>7585393
How ironic.
>>7582068
Malamud
Deleuze and Guattari
>>7584129
how's that intro the philosophy course treating you?
>>7584930
> a systemitiser in the old philosopher/science sense which he wasn't very good at
Why do you think this? Schopenhauer got rid of a good deal of the intricacy of Kant's system - especially the latter's model of the understanding and of ethics - but Schopenhauer still articulated a system that strikes me as quite comprehensive and nuanced, and not just regarding what he repeated from Kant.
I'm thinking especially of the more innovative systematic roles played by: his views on the principle of sufficient reason; his adapting and combining the concepts of "natural forces," "spatiotemporal individuation," and "Platonic Ideas" for both theoretical and aesthetic purposes; and his correlation of the mental and the ideal with the physical and the real, from which he draws interesting conclusions about human embodiment and the causes of dreams.
>>7584129
>Well first of all he is backing all his stuff to other people's cool stuff. He has no metapsychical claim whatsoever. His writings are really poor in terms of literature.
>He is basicly a self improvement book author.
Maybe if you've only read a collection like pic related.
kundera
ayer
Hemingway
Vonnegut
FMD
SAK
>>7582345
Favorite Faulk novel?
Borges
Schopenhauer
>>7582068
Samuel Taylor Coleridge
Marcus Aurelius
