Has anyone written on the subject of art? More specefically tried to define it to include good works of such as Beethoven and exclude 50 cent? I'm trying to argue against the moral relativists
on the standard of taste
>>7580861
morality ==//== aesthetics
Yeah there is an ENTIRE philosophy field called Aesthetics.
Lessing - Laocoön
Kant - Critique of Judgement
Schlegel/Mendelssohn write some stuff on it
Adorno - Aesthetics
Deleuze has multiple works on the subject
>>7580879
Furthermore, it's pretty easy to dismiss moral relativists, they're laughed out of academia. What's his central point of argument?
>>7580879
I don't want to read all that, give me a TL;DR.
I just want to BTFO feminists
a /pol/ shitpost without the word cuck, im surprised, sure here's som--
>I don't want to read all that
these fucking inbreds...
>>7580888
fuck off
i hate feminists too but "I don't want to read"
>>>/reddit/
>>7580886
I'm dealing with a normie here.
His argument is anything can be considered art, All music, paint, film etc.
>>7580934
Art used to be something to cherish
Now literally anything could be art
This post is art.
>>7580934
>"normie"
You aren't on /r9k/
Define 'art' btw.
>>7580861
>Has anyone written on the subject of art?
What a retarded question
>>7580934
Well there are many definitions of art but going just by 2016 sensibilities I'd say he's correct.
