I am >> I'm
He is >> He's
They are >> They're
Why the fuck people write shouldn't instead of should'nt? The latter contraction makes more fucking sense
because the missing "o" sound affects pronunciation, not the missing " " sound
>>7579438
>I am >> Iam >> I'm
>He is >> Heis >> He's
They are >> Theyare >> They're
the apostrophe replaces one letter and a space
you, meanwhile, are a fucking retard
>>7579452
wait... fuk
>>7579461
very appropriate memeing
>>7579461
infinitely well meme'd
God you are so fucking autistic.
The apostrophe removes the vowel.
>I am - 'a' is removed
>He is - 'i' is removed
>They are - 'a' is removed
So it's only logical that the 'o' would be removed from "shouldn't".
You're actually retarded if you don't accept this rule of English.
>>7579453
>So they are drawn to sympathy toward Islam because it is not-us: non-Western, non-American, neither Christian nor a product of the Enlightenment.
towards buddhism as well. but they are not against enlightenment. the liberal and libertarian have faith in what they call science, and they pray very hard that science will back up their human rights. if what they call science does not back up their moral principles, then they cease to call science what disagree with their faith in the human as a willing agent, who must be more or less autonomous depending on the liberal doctrine you study.
>tfw you realise you can do double and triple contractions.
I will have -> I'll've
It could not have -> It'd'nt've
God bless.
>>7579969
It'dn't've*
Whoops.
