>"If you dun beleive in muh jebus then you have nothing to believe in."
>"Oh my, I didn't believe in muh jebus and I did horrible things, therefore you are right!"
Why hasn't this cunt been sacked yet? Do people take this reductive shit seriously?
Dosto is a bad philosopher but a 10/10 writer, so he's still respected.
>>7578109
OP here
while we're at it, doesnt it suck how there are barely any women or PoC writers talked about on /lit/? this isn't what I expected from a literary board..
>>7578109
>lunatics like Sartre are allowed to babble about nonsense and be praised
>Dostoevsky uses bad logic but since it regards a religion I don't follow he's automatically a shit writer
>>7578109
yes because it's fucking amazing
>>7578169
uses bad logic once* is what I meant to write
Try reading The Possessed and then Solzhenitsyn's The Gulag Archipelago consecutively, then come back and say that.
Nice thread.
>>7578109
>average atheist
and you wonder why you people aren't taken seriously
>>7578224
/thread
>>7578224
Most philosophers are atheists.
>>7578186
b-but real communism has never been tried shitlord
>>7578252
Name 10 without google or wiki