thoughts on this? what publishers should be where, should we make it more detailed?
>>7575515
Everyman in hit or miss. I generally stick to Oxford when I can get them.
Why do I give a fuck about publishers again?
Should be more like:
Academia tier:
Norton
Oxford
Loeb
Hackett
Obscure/patrician/hister tier:
NYRB
Hesperius
A few more I can't remember atm
In-between tier:
Everyman
Modern
Mass market tier:
Penguin
Viking
>>7575519
Some have better translators, introductions, notes, quality and aesthetic covers.
I'm thinking something like this
>>7575560
everyman is more aesthetic than modern library and is also hard cover/nicer quality. some modern library have poor covers. notes are sometimes good sometimes totally useless.
ok everymans staying on good and added a few more
Folio are gaudy trash
But really these sorts of lists are trash
If you take these charts seriously you're a sheepish pleb trash
>>7575627
thats why its in the fancy section not the good one.
>>7575671
But they're not fancy
