>>7564726
You're right, that's why stories like Eragon and Twilight are so good, the characters are uniform throughout and the authors have such descriptive prose for describing events!

>>7564803
person who has spouted "character development" in the past couple days spotted
eat shit and shit

This thread feels like you got criticized or rejected from something because of static characters.

Can you tell us why you think static characters are better? Can you provide some examples of decent static characters?

>>7564975
Not him, but Alexei and Dmitri in Brothers K.

>Character is stupid and learns a lesson
>That's good development

>Character is born with their way of thinking and backs it up with experience that is hinted towards in slight deviation of speech that you must gather and grasp for complete enlightenment of the character's true battle
>Boo that's bad.

They should make simple mistakes to fulfill the void of simple crowds.

File: 1452122677347.jpg (86 KB, 480x480) Image search: [Google]

86 KB, 480x480

>>7564975
Journey to the End of the Night.

Pic related

>>7564803
So much this guys. You just love a character so much more when they'll never change...Edward+Bella 4ever

>>7564975
No I actually just flew over these two posts >>7563196 >>7563586 and got triggered
though, full disclosure, I've no idea what it is they're talking about

>>7565074
And these two >>7564803 >>7565064 couldn't be further convincing me that only clueless retards would advocate making use of that notion as criticism if they were studied trolls

>>7564975
Iago