>there are actually people out there who prefer film over literature
and many of them are smarter than you are too.
>>7562455
>implying I don't have an IQ of +165
>>7562455
They are dumb, family. Their medium is a passive experience.
>>7562459
That is incredibly unlikely.
>>7562443
The experience is different, and since film is a younger medium, and often has a profit motive attached the quality is often less.
That said works like The Seventh Sign or Jagtenor Conan the Barbarianhave given me feels that are equal to literature.
>>7562466
For you
>there are people out there
>>7562460
Video Games confirmed for GOAT art form
>>7562493
No it's just incredibly unlikely because you don't know how to even into bell-curves. You're implying that you're part of the .0008% of the population with a 165+ IQ, that's very unlikely.
>>7562653
He took a very forgiving online test at sparknotes.com
>>7562460
And somehow reading a book isn't a passive experience.
>>7562670
Yeah, I never understood what the difference was.
That said, /lit/ master race. Compare the experience of watching to greatest films to the experience of watch the greatest novels. Yeah. /lit/ wins every time.
The Martian was better in book form
>>7562443
Different strokes for different folks
If you're really unironically making these kinds of comparative value judgements about totally different mediums, then you must not actually understand art at all.
>>7562459
you're a shithead for saying that
nobody here is a 12 year old gifted program student, so nobody is threatened by you.
>>7562493
>>7562653
B T F O
T
F
O
>>7562443
I don't think it's a choice. I got very interested in films and feelings that pictures can evoke. My father and my sister spend most of their free time reading, somehow I rarely enjoy reading.
I felt bad about it for a while and I still think it's a pity
>>7562742
Jesus, I just reread my post. I might be illiterate, that would explain a lot
>>7562443
THX1138 > 1984
>films
top kek
>>7562443
Wrong board cunt
