>le quirky tripfag nonsense

>>>/reddit/

>>7536272
>What are some of the best and/or greatest contemporary works of philosophy?

alain badiou's.

>>7536276
>I don't understand therefore it's nonsense

You're a living cliche

Reassembling the Social - Bruno Latour
1000 Years of Nonlinear History - Manuel Delanda
1000 Plateaus - Deleuze & Guattari

>>7536408
I am irrelevant to this. Nonsense by virtue of bollocks. Return yourself to irrelevance.

>>7536423
>>7536281
Really? Is Marxian shit "the best and greatest" of today? Fuck off.

>>7536431
>i don't read philosophy but i have opinions on it
>Marxian

how people can publicly be this moronic and not be embarrassed i'll never know

>>7536272
http://www.theonion.com/article/word-millennials-forced-headline-boost-pageviews-50880

>>7536439
The title of the work is "Mundus MILLENNIALIS" not "Mundus MILLENNIALS". Learn to read, m80.

>>7536454
Those words are almost the same aside from that 'I' you fool.

>>7536464
No shit? The point is they aren't the same word and that they don't mean the same thing, you numbskull.

>>7536464
Hosed wards art atmost tie mame atide frown thot 'I' you foil.

>>7536474
>>7536474
That isn't my point. The article implies that the inclusion of 'Millennial' within one's headline/title boosts views; one may be browsing the internet, spot 'Mundus MILLENNIALIS' and think "That says 'millenials'; I shall view that page".

>>7536497
But what is the point of making that point?

>>7536517
This person: >>7536454, claimed 'Millennialis' is different from 'Millennials', so this persons post/joke: >>7536439, didn't apply in this. My point was that the joke still applied, as one could easily mistake MILLENNIALIS for MILLENNIALS.

File: cover[1].png (113 KB, 270x401) Image search: [Google]

113 KB, 270x401

>>7536272
Is this the meme duality of internet philosophy?

How to Bomb the US Government

>>7536574
>One website is white with black typeface, the other is black with white typeface


It's like pottery

I dunno, philosophy is sort of at a turning point because post-modern has been pretty much done to death and many writers and thinkers are now just regurgitating things from anywhere between 20-60 years ago. I suppose the next big philosopher movement would be with regards to medicine and genetics/mechnical augmentations because bioethicists are already debating that.

>>7537024
>I don't know what philosophy is: The Post