who is the greatest post-nietzsche philosopher
or writer in general
thomas foster joyce
Russell.
>>7508932
thats like asking which neet was the mist productive one
heidegger - retrogression to romanticism
sartre - lmao
freud - lmao
russell - reddit the philosopher
wittgenstein - maybe
quine - boring
rorty - boring
singer - boring
all the rest - boring
so maybe wittgenstein but idk
>>7508932
the buddha
>>7508932
Evola
>>7508932
Sam Harris
Has anyone else noticed that Nietzsche seems to really attract the narcissists among us?
You know.. those who see themselves above the rules being ubermenschen and all that?
One of my umm... friends (kinda) is one of those always-right, continuously interrupting, arrogant, hatred filled peeps we all know and love. Every conversation he has to quote Nietzsche 3-4 times.
Anyone had any similar experiences?
I feel like Nietzsche has been ruined for me since I associate him with said individual.
>>7508957
Rorty isn't boring, he's actually pretty based.
Derrida and Foucault could be called a lot of bad things, but boring isn't one of them.
>>7508957
y no frege :'(
>>7509011
this is why I never fucking read anything
it makes me a worse person
also your gif is as unsettling as it is hypnotic to watch
but yeah nietzsche really draws in the trenchcoat mafia types. just one of those things that make people shitty
david foster wallace
im not even kidding
>>7508935
James motherfuckin Joyce
>>7509504
>Rorty isn't boring
Yes he is. He's arguably, after Kant, one of the most pathetic philosophers ever.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTSdyxKyHrU
>>7509567
I don't know about Rorty, but Kant is really interesting.
Me. AMA
>>7509612
who is the second greatest post-nietzsche philosopher
>>7508940
you are russling my feathers
zizek
>>7509649
my dick. AMDA
>>7508957
Heidegger isn't a retrogression to romanticism it's the biggest german idealist since Hegel.
Also Foucault is good !
what about deleuze
>>7509754
*Foucault is interesting. I get that every argument has to start from an assumption, but I have no idea wtf he's drawing his assumptions from sometimes. His philosophy is a lot like Psychoanalysis in that way.
heidegger or deleuze
reading 1000 plateaus again and it's like a non stop bukkake of philosophy
>>7509785
>I get that every argument has to start from an assumption
And that's why most people still think that philosophy is "muh believes"-tier. Actually if you take the example of phenomenology, there are no assumption.
>>7509796
>if you take the example of phenomenology, there are no assumption.
phenomenology assumes that we can bracket experience, and that this act of bracketing is somehow outside experience
>>7509838
>mfw he did not read Hegel
sorry mate, this arrgument is invalid, the Absolute is not braketed experience.
>>7509887
>Hegel
Christopher Nolan
>>7509997
fuck off back where you came from
>>7509985
>i don't understand it, it must be bullshit
Maurice Merleu-Ponty
>>7509997
Bane?
richard dawkins
Wittgenstein
Unironically Sam Harris
>>7510528
Best from him?
We're still pre-nietzsche
icycalm
>>7510564
He kinda has to be read in chronological order. You can't understand PI without reading Tractatus.
>>7511239
Tractatus is basically a prima facie implausible strawman that only exists to make the Investigations look important.
>look guise I just done refuted my own shitty argument that only autists take seriously!
>>7508957
>freud - lmao
kill yourself
>>7509011
they probably haven't read nietzsches, the man was genial and apolitical. never made an enemy in his life by his own account and i mean i could go on but actually reading nietzsche would help
>>7509985
>1831+184
>not praising Hegel
>>7510593
>Am I understood? ... Have I been understood?
I unironically agree with this actually. Freud was a good Nietzschean.
>>7509011
"What is that Nietzsche? Shut the fuck up!" -Rust Cohle / me in class
>>7508932
My favorites are Carl Schmitt (Nazi, read for his dislikes, when he starts spouting what he thinks we all should do, stop listening), Foucault (discipline and punish, history of sexuality, what is an author?), Hannah Arendt (the human condition, or even better the origins of totalitarianism), Giorgio Agamben (Homo Sacer, one of my favorite books period, very brief, and powerful. There's a schematic of Birkenau on the cover, to give you an idea of the intensity), and some of Jaques Ranciere's book Dissensus. I grasp Heideggar's importance and i like a lot of his ideas but i have trouble tolerating his tortured prose, but to each their own.
>>7508932
People who answered Dawkins or Harris, I doubt those two have even read Nietzsche let alone reacted to his ideas.
>>7511684
I thought Rust just said
>I read Nietzsche.
>>7509543
Nietzsche don't make people shitty.
The gif is from a famous movie you should know
Nick Land
Carnap.
>>7511662
>never made an enemy in his life
>by his own account
yeah, sounds like a delusional narcissist t b h f a m
>>7508932
WITTGENSTEIN
THE THIRD
AUTHOR OF
ON
CERTAINTY
>>7508932
heidegger or wittgenstein
I really don't see any other philosopher that is post-Nietzsche getting closer than these two.
>>7510007
You first, reddit
>>7508935
nabokov & beckett imo
Emil Cioran or Evola.
there hasn't been anyone even remotely worthy of the mantle yet
de Chardin
Heidegger, and if you have the balls, he wrote a fuckton on Nietzsche
>>7512425
>everything is fine
>In Heaven
>>7508932
Probably Heidegger and Evola for me.
