Lets go, lads.
Any of the Wordsworth Classics series.
>>7483612
does anyone know where I can buy more of Saddam's books?
She just gives zero fucks about appearance.
>>7483887
It would be kind of hypocritical of her if she did.
>>7483887
>implying she doesn't look comfy as fuck
>>7483887
>Implying you wouldn't
>>7483887
You again?
>>7483887
just get a trip so we can filter you bro
>>7483990
I wonder if it's the return of Feminister...
nyrb missed out on this one
Ugliest cover i have
>>7484072
Wat de neuk is dat?
>>7484089
een meesterwerk
>>7484072
Ripoff.
>>7483887
is that fucking hagrid
>>7482625
That's pretty close to most Spanish covers of just about anything serious tbqhfam. Not that Zizy is all that serious.
It is obligatory to post Tutis
>>7484272
>you're a CIS white male Harry
>>7484381
The shadow of the log makes it look like the cowboy has pissed his pants.
>>7484281
Why is Karl Marx on the front?
>>7484406
>not appreciating Know When To Hold 'Em as a searing indictment of vanguardism
>not appreciating Just Dropped In as agit-prop detailing the nature and impact of alienation
>being this lumpen
>>7484381
yep, it's wood
>>7484423
I actually like the design of this one.
>>7484430
based
>>7484426
>>7484480
Instead of all the obscure/bizarre titles, what say let's get back to posting some legitimate respected works of literature with odd covers.
>>7484398
this is the artist saying "how many ways can i hint that i'm totally gay while still being able to play it off as harmless fun" and failing miserably.
this is what we get when society makes the gays be closeted.
>>7484413
i love his work
>>7484441
>>7484270
>implying this isn't fucking brilliant
>>7482625
i think that Wordsworth is losing it.
