Is there a bigger meme than "reading for prose"?
Fuck you for making another shit thread on lit you cunt
>>7479726
>insinuating
pic related 2bh
>>7479766
It sure is getting Reddit in here.
Reddit exclusively reads for prose, tbqh
>>7479721
Yes there is, it's reading for "story".
>>7479793
You mean "plot," you utter tool.
>>7479721
Is there a definitive way to describe McCarthy and Faulkners prose? I always end up referring to it as being very candid but also very vivid. I want to find more prose like in Suttree.
>>7479866
The term is "garbage"
>>7479885
ebin
>>7479866
>very candid but also very vivid
Canvid? Vidid?
>>7479799
It's actually "reading poetry"
>>7480574
>implying poetry isn't the pinnacle of literature
>>7479866
monolithic is the word that comes to my mind. his description feels engraved in a stone tablet.
>>7480580
>implying poetry in 2015 isn't all self-indulgent masturbatory shite
>>7480622
>tfw this is true
What are some contemporary poets I can read, analyze, and then do the opposite of?
