> that face when neither Nietzsche nor Hume ever refuted, or even addressed, Aristotle
who gives a fuck about some 2000 year old olive eating pederast
Aristotle is overrated. Theophrastus would have completely obscured him in history were it not for the machinations of *ahem* certain Greek aristocrats.
Also, >>>/his/
>>7453705
I do. Who cares about you?!? Not even your mom! If you have a girlfriend, she's cheating on you. Go fuck yourself.
Damn, do you know how dumb you sound?
>>7453705
>who gives a fuck about some 2000 year old olive eating pederast
he literallly says pederasty is a degenerate compulsion comparable to people who eat dirt, pull their hair out or chew their fingernails
he had a wife and son as well
>>7453758
Fucking nailbiters, we should hang the lot of them
>>7453758
>thinks pederastry is degenerate
opinion discarded
>>7453711
Are you retarded?
Aristotle's works survived history because of Muslim scholars
>>7453701
Because Francis Bacon already disposed of him
>tfw you type out that face when
>tfw you put a space between the meme arrow and your meme sentence
>tfw you're fresh off the boat from reddit
>>7454227
This, and because Nietzsche is somewhat Aristotelian
>>7454227
>Bacon
My God, /lit/ really has gone down the drain
>>7453701
>Nietzsche
>never even addressed Aristotle
He uses Aristotle's Rheotric's definition n The AntiChrist to denounce pity. Hume likewise has writings on tragedy based on the standard lain out in Aristotle's Poetics. It's like OP doesn't read shit besides greentext
>>7454243
It's you who needs to read deeper if you think those count as tangible critiques of any kind of Aristotelianism.
>>7453701
>refuting someone who any intelligent person knows was full of shit
It would be a waste of time.
>>7453705
Olives are fucking tasty you pleb
>>7453701
Only the kind of sentimental hand wavers who are inclined to religion take Aristotle seriously enough to think he warrants refutation.
>>7454542
Nah, m8 they're two of the babby passages, it's hard to get them wrong. Nietzsche even explicitly name checks Aristotle, unlike his usual 2deep4u allusions, and both bring up the concept of contempt which Aristotle never develops and even disavows in part. It's a very real and tangible criticism as Aristolean views of tragedy are about a third of the philosophical basis of canonThe other two being comedy and epics which your gold plated stupidity cover nicely in your farce of a "rebuttal"
