>>7438539
>>7436519
>>7437514
These threads have had good posts.

there are good posts on /lit/ you just have to ask and ignore the shitposts. like in the poetry thread a good anon is doing god's work, there was a very successful intro to foucault thread earlier today and the vasily grossman thread is pretty non-aids.

File: 1448350701497.png (71 KB, 903x670) Image search: [Google]

71 KB, 903x670

>>7438547
Yeah the Foucault one was good.
>>7436837
This has a good post in it
>>7436944
Also pic related

>>7438553
And this has a good post
>>7437210
Basically if you stop shitposting and looking in shitposting threads, you'd see good posts

>>7438545
That "Should I read the Quran" thread was badass.

>>7438567
yeah. lots of good lit. There are some academics here who can recommend several books in their field

>>7438567
The Quran thread started out good, but then devolved into two people flirting with each other in Arabic.

>>7438593
Would you call that evolution post-ironic, or post-symbolic?

>>7438567
If you liked the quran thread, then you'll like this post
>>7438097

>>7438593
>flirting in arabic
I only see arabic at the very bottom. the good posts are the ones with book names

>>7438539
Compartmentalisation is a thing, bruh. Academic types can come here to relax- they're not writing theses 24/7.

>>7438609
Fuck off with your liberal shit.

>>7438609
post-ironic personally.

>>7438618
>implying sandniggers have ever done anything good

>>7438629
...having said that, I wouldn't necessarily recommend having this place as your only outlet for intellectual discussion. Seminars and real-life discussions tend to have a noticeably higher ratio of content to shitposting.

>>7438611
>>7438567
Haha. I made both posts.

>>7438649
Eh, I think it's mostly better to just read. Most of my peers don't bring any new insights. And here you can have fun while talking about Nietzsche or whoever while academics are sort of stiffy.

>>7438632
woah. Dude. Driver's licenses expire. It happens to everyone.

>>7438634
Also my choice.

>>7438692
>>7438609
Why do you find my book recs post-ironic? :s

>>7438539
academics are boring. stop romanticizing muh IRL INTELLECTUALS

>>7438700
I meant the above description about an Islamic lit thread devolving into a conflict between two posters in Arabic to be post-ironic. I didn't actually read what your recos were.

>>7438731
Oh so the description of the thread itself is post-ironic. OK.

>tfw these labels feel empty now after so much overusage

>>7438700
But now that I've moseyed over and taken a look at it, I am even more in the post-ironic camp, now with a banner post-kekic to boot. The /pol/tard probably is not even aware of the imperative as a verbal mood, and when I went to select the text to put into a translator, my inline made me swipe right-to-left.

sides, car, door, hand, hook....

>>7438754
maybe it's because I'm sleep-deprived, but I don't understand what you mean. My recs were made sincerely and I usually ignore bait posts or try to lessen the sting of them by treating them seriously :s