What do you think /lit/?
Should this book be moved from the children's section or are the CIS White parents wrong to complain?
>[Author] James Dawson criticises parents who attacked his LGBT guide [titled 'This Book Is Gay'] for children
>The book has been challenged in Wasilla, Alaska, after a 10-year-old boy picked it up from the juvenile non-fiction shelf of the public library, and his mother was “shocked to find it contained frank drawings and descriptions of gay sex acts inside”
Excerpt:
"“As with hand jobs and breakfast eggs, all men like their blowjobs differently.”
http://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/nov/26/james-dawson-criticises-parents-who-attacked-his-lgbt-guide-for-children
>>7395875
No opinion but this guy looks a little bit retarded, no? Got any photos with him more expressive, meme material namean?
I definitely think it should be removed. Children shouldn't be taught stuff like that.
>>7395976
Bigot detected. Literally LingMAO at your ignorance.
#lovewins
>>7395982
I am gay myself. But 10 year Olds do not belong reading about handjobs and blowjobs or seeing graphical depictions of sex.
>for children
>frank drawings and descriptions of gay sex acts inside
Wait, what
>>7395976
>>7395996
>>7395996
Fifth Column pls go
>>7396003
It's 2015, retard. Catch up.
Okay, better question now. Is there butt stuff? I feel like this is what's important to know here.
>>7396007
What is your point?
Kids shouldn't be playing with guns either. It isn't safe.
You know....if somebody wrote a children's book explaining straight sex to kids people would flip the fuck out.
but because it's a gay book, of course we have to be accepting of gay people and not criticize them at all because they're super oppressed and lead such horribly difficult lives and deserve special treatment from the rest of us. Of course, they're the same as us ultimately though, no differences whatsoever.
>>7396067
>if somebody wrote a children's book explaining straight sex to kids people would flip the fuck out.
There's no "if", there are lots of books explaining straight sex. I don't see anyone flipping out about it.
>>7396072
There are no books marketed to ten years old with sentences like: ""“As with hand jobs and breakfast eggs, all men like their blowjobs differently.”"
Prove me wrong
>>7396072
Yeah....there's plenty of books about straight sex, fucko. Is there plenty of books about straight sex MARKETED TO CHILDREN?
No, there isn't. try reading, and understanding an argument before you make a comment. Hope you get herpes, thanks.
>>7396081
That's a video. And I'm not opening it I'm at work.
>>7396084
I am aware that it's a video.
>>7396081
>Um. Yes, there are lots. You're retarded.
Um, no there isn't. Try backing up your faggot arguments with facts sometime.
>>7396086
Facts are all CIS white males rely on to support their so-called arguments. Sad.
>>7396077
Years ago I saw a children's book at a library that explained straight sex with pictures. I can't remember any direct quotes, but it pretty much straight-up said "the man puts his dick in the pussy and it feels good" and had a drawing of two people having sex.
>>7396086
>hurr durr
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Best-Sellers-Books-Childrens-Sex-Education/zgbs/books/301803
>>7396067
What if somebody wrote a book about straight sex, marketed to children, but only explaining the deviant stuff like water sports, crush play, ball stomping, blood, scat, pegging, all of that stuff.
Then you could use the angle like, "Hey you can't oppress me because i enjoy having a women piss all over my face! I'm a victim! You MUST accept me!"
I bet that'd sell a shit load.
>>7396091
That's a pretty standard health book about human reproduction. Not so much about sex and giving blowjobs.
Keep trying though, shitdick, you're making yourself look dumber and dumber.
>>7396094
Maybe, maybe not. It's still a book about sex aimed at children, which is what we were discussing.
>>7395996
>I am gay
dropped
r
o
p
p
e
d
>>7396096
Why are you so upset?
>>7396100
Because you're an annoying faggot.
>>7396097
Not really. We're discussing pushing graphic illustrations of sexual acts that do not contribute to human reproduction.
>>7396081
That's not a book, it's a video. And it's degenerative filth. Downright disgusting that kids are watching. But honestly, what do you expect from the Swedes.
>>7396103
>Yeah....there's plenty of books about straight sex, fucko. Is there plenty of books about straight sex MARKETED TO CHILDREN?
>No, there isn't. try reading, and understanding an argument before you make a comment. Hope you get herpes, thanks.
>>7396104
I dunno, they're fish and meatballs are good i guess. Didn't know they sit around making cartoon porn for kids....maybe they should partner up with the japanese, share ideas.
>>7396102
At least I know how to pluralise.
>>7396098
Why so homophobic?
>>7396089
>it pretty much straight-up said "the man puts his dick in the pussy and it feels good" and had a drawing of two people having sex.
>>7396089
That's disgusting. I am just as much against that as I am against this.
>>7396118
No it's not, because society functions due to the consistent reproduction of its members. Because the method of reproduction can and often does involve the transmission of disease, and because the act itself can seem quite intimidating and confusing to people, a reasonable sexual education system presents the scientific facts of reproduction in a way that does not make the sexual act as a hedonistic hobby.
>>7396067
My parents bought me a book on sex and growing up when I was around twelve. Then when I started getting older they had awkward long talks with me about being careful with girls. Books about straight sex exist, it's "where do babies come from" tier, and people don't flip the fuck out over them because it's easier to buy the book than to explain to a child how much papa loves penetrating mama.
Now grow up
degenerates should not be allowed to teach children
at least wait until they are undergrads to ruin their minds with this kind of stuff
>>7396329
Ugh, looks like /pol/ is here now....*sigh*
>>7396398
Was she supposed to walk around with an assault rifle slung over her shoulder?
Simply getting a bigger door seems to be the best solution, no?
>>7396411
bruh
>>7396252
"Where do babies come from" does not include talking about how men like to get their handjobs and blowjobs better. It also does not include graphic depictions of sex. You wanna talk sex ed, fine. But kids do not need books targeted to them talking about sucking dick.
>>7396398
What is your point? You think a child would have been able to grab a gun and be able to stop him? What if the kid shot the mom instead? I am very pro gun, and believe if you break in someone's home that person has every right to kill you a defend their property. But guns are not toys and do no belong in the hands of children.
We should live in a pure world like Shimoneta
>>7396330
Not him, but I frequent this board and /pol/
>>7396330
>...
>*action*
fuck off back to Gaia online or reddit
>>7396479
we know, you're part of the problem
>>7396484
Why you no like /pol/
