apology for poor english
when were you when god dies?
i was sat at home eating angel food cake when nietzsche ring
‘god is kill’
‘no’
How can one philosopher be so based?
>metaphysics: BTFO
>morality: BTFO
>religion: BTFO
>Rationalists: BTFO
>the Self: BTFO
>causation: BTFO
>induction: BTFO
>all scientific paradigms before and since: BTFO
>philosophy: BTFO
Where were you when the entirety of human intellectual history was kill?
What would Nietzsche make of selfies?
>>7386793
Then one man came to free the Empiricist scum...
>>7386809
>causation must be so, to think otherwise would be absurd
>everything must have rules
Kant literally states these things without making any argument for them at all.
>>7386793
>morality: BTFO
you know how I can tell you haven't read anything by Hume?
>>7386822
>replying to a meme
>>7386822
Morality as it was understood prior to Hume was BTFO. Hume turned it into purely a matter of sentiment and taste.
>>7386809
>"By means of a means (faculty)"--he had said, or at least meant to say. But, is that--an answer? An explanation? Or is it not rather merely a repetition of the question? How does opium induce sleep? "By means of a means (faculty)," namely the virtus dormitiva, replies the doctor in Moliere,
>Quia est in eo virtus dormitiva, Cujus est natura sensus assoupire.
Kant: BTFO
>>7386822
Are you one of those morons who think An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals is normative?
This thread needs to recognize its inherent sinfulness.
>>7386839
Augustine would say this thread is sin free, since it wasn't created by sexual conception.
>>7386835
I don't see how it's moronic considering the book is filled with normative judgments
>>7386843
Ah, so it's Immaculate, then.
>>7386848
How does it feel to be illiterate?
>>7386849
Not if you're Orthodox
>>7386839
>>7386870
Wittgenstein one makes no sense.
>>7386870
What would Aquinas' be?
>>7386870
>no Sartre
>no Heiddiger
You have but only half of philosophy there.
>>7386878
It had me scratching my head momentarily as well, but the author seems to be enumerating the various "senses" of donut, to use Wittgenstein's word.
5.47322. A "donut", for example, has many senses:
a. The literal food,
b. which has the same shape as our numeral 0 which denotes the quantity of nothingness,
c. which word also indicates a continuous 360-degree maneuver performed in an automobile, often done recklessly or on ice, the resultant path being described being similar to the above two shapes,
d. which furthermore calls to mind the toroidal shape of an automobile's tire, or for that matter a spare tire (which although not a common usage, cannot be said to be a "wrong" sense, per the above),
[insert simple diagram of a toroid],
e. "and so on."
>>7386912
donuts can be proven to exist a priori regardless of our faith in donuts
>>7386919
*sniff*
>>7386870
Locke is an idiot and this proves it.
>>7386924
How?
>>7386822
found the pleb friends
>>7386945
google quinque vinae
>>7386962
http://www.cafepress.com/+quinque-vintage+t-shirts
>>7386970
meant quinque viae woops
>>7386982
Oh religious crap, forget I asked. Woops.
>>7386870
Marx certainly thought he deserved a lot of doughnuts - the fact idiot.
>>7386991
do u not know who aquinas is
>>7386998
fat idiot* idiot.
>>7386999
Yeah, after a hundred pages of him I tore my eyes out. I'm typing this through my will against God -- or put better for will for logic and truth.
>>7386991
I see the reddit fedoras are out in force today
>>7387043
>reddit fedoras
typifying ppl doesn't make god not Dead.
do anyone remeber derrido?
he came and he say me:
"there is text but not outside"
i look up, he is vanish! without say any more
anyone can help remeber dorito final word/?
>>7386878
meaning of donut is variable and subject to context
The donut can said to be both eaten and still on the plate.
Would Nietzsche have liked anime?
>>7388887
nice try, pal
>>7388888
>>7388809
he would of condemned weeb faggots for being so weak and cringeworthy
