Evola’s thought can be considered one of the most radically and consistently antiegalitarian, antiliberal, antidemocratic, and antipopular systems in the twentieth century
Discuss.
>>7373018
>Thin hair.
I don't care what ugly people have to say.
>>7373039
spoken like a true anglo
>>7373044
Which is strange, because Anglos tend to be the ugliest.
>>7373018
riding the tiger is a codeword for homosex.
>>7373061
He never advocated for homosex
could have been closest gay tho
>>7373058
It's pretty interesting but by his own admission the world is far to along the wrong path to ever be righted, so it's not really a practical philosophy.
>>7373462
go shit up some other board, faggot
>>7373058
Wrong, Nordic Master Race.
>>7373462
FUCK YOU , leather man
Basically he used his brain and thought for himself.
>>7373018
> discussing Evola
> 4chan
I'm not inclined to think this is the proper medium.
>>7373499
>he thinks like I do! :)
>he's smart and a "freethinker"! xD
>>7373491
lol show many any evidence that there's anyone on /fa/ who's not ugly af
>>7373588
fuck you
Maybe you and I should settle it right here on the thread if you think you're so tough ?
“For the authentic revolutionary conservative, what really counts is to be faithful not to past forms and institutions, but rather to principles of which such forms and institutions have been particular expressions, adequate for a specific period of time and in a specific geographical area.”
>>7373676
sure
>show many any evidence that there's anyone
If you manage to do this you have won.
>>7373732
I'll show you who's boss of this board
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvxdWnfzpRU
no, Pentti Linkola
>>7373567
What's the proper medium?
>>7374509
Oil painting.
>>7373758
wat
>>7373068
Most traditionalists are.
>>7373758
That guy's so badass. I kind of admire him, even though his general views are a mix of good ideas with fucking insanity.
>>7373018
Evola was gay and a closet Moslem.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Julius-Evola-The-Sufi-Rome-ebook/dp/B0082BSGFU
>>7373462
you're a real shitheel but that was funny
>>7373018
lmfao this thread is a fucking disaster. Hoped for some intelligent discussion of Evola, instead I got shit posting of the highest degree.
>>7375515
He's kinda retarded imo. Ted Kaczynski was at least intelligent and literate.
>>7375674
What did you expect? Evola is basically a meme. Have you read his shit? It reads like he was high while writing half of it.
>>7375674
you started the thread by pointing out something obvious and then ask us to discuss, no citation of a specific passage followed by "i think this, how about you?", not even "ride the tiger was like this", but "evola: elitist?"
seriously fuck niggers like you who think they aren't shitposting
>>7375715
fuck off you retarded assbaby , how can you be absolutely sure he made this thread ?
>>7375715
I agree with this guy. You can't just mention a topic and expect "intelligent" discussion to arise.
>>7375721
who cares
>>7375724
3rded. I've read Evola and kinda like some aspects, but what the fuck is there to discuss? That's not how you start a thread.
>>7375730
veritas est adæquatio intellectus et rei
>>7375737
perhaps, but the truth value is irrelevant to my point
>>7375734
So...
What aspect do you like ?
>>7373438
Sure, if everything must be about this very specific 'world' abstraction you're using. Groups can delink and sort out their own ethics, however.
Here's something to talk about: Why do you think he loved René Guénon so much? In what way did it influence Evola, and how can Evola be relevant today with what's going on in the the world?
>>7376353
>how can Evola be relevant today with what's going on in the the world?
>>7376353
>Why do you think he loved René Guénon so much
Because Guenon did think abrahamic faiths were more likely to be true than pagan ones, while still adhering to the view that in practical matters pagan virtues beat certain aspects of the monotheistic beliefs.
>>7376372
that's my kind of guy
>>7376353
>Why do you think he loved René Guénon so much?
Because he was a kekservative who loved Muslims and race-mixers.
>>7377033
/pol/ pls
>>7373588
that is considered "fashionable" ?
