What is some essential nationalist and fascist core?
>>7361213
Drieu la Rochelle
Montherlant
Le Maistre
Barrès
Mauriac
[Céline]
>>7361218
>>7361213
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Doctrine_of_Fascism
>>7361665
>The Lord of the Rings
>>7361975
Yeah, I wondered about that too. I guess it's because it accepts nationalism. All the races work together in the end but still remain independent and unique. They aren't forced into some multi-cultural experiment which leads to degeneracy.
>>7361977
Good point
>>7361665
Fiction list is terrible. Replace Lord of the rings with DH Lawrence and Dostoevsky.
>>7361669
Read only the first part, which has the main tenets of Fascism. The second one is full of propaganda shit by Musso.
You will know when you enter the second one by the sudden change in style and substance.
you already know them all, they were influential in many other ways and belong to european canon. stop looking for some 3rd rate obscure shit, as if there was some secret underground guru.
ohhh boy
>>7361213
The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century by Houston Chamberlain
also don't listen to /lit/ for right-wing material, you are just going to get a bunch of subliminal marxist books from all the leftist memesters that infest this place
i would suggest asking /natsoc/ or go to 8cha(n)
google doesn't show search results with their url anymore so might want to use a different search engine
>>7364294
fuck i love that guy
>>7364297
i know man
i just wish there was something like him for other languages
I actually study this shit in undergrad, finally I feel useful. I'm gonna comment on what others have posted and then come back with some more recs in a bit.
>>7361669
Only commenting on the ones I know
>Starship Troopers
debatable whether this is fascist or not, but whatever
>Carl Schmitt
good
>Thomas Carlyle
I wouldn't say this work is fascist, but there's a lot to be gained as far as an understanding of the hero cult and how it was viewed in the 19th c.
>Origins and Doctrine of Fascism
Very good, this work was originally credited to Mussolini, it's the official doctrine of "true" (ie, Mussolini-style) fascism
Also I'm gonna disagree with >>7362201 and suggest that you read the whole thing. The propaganda part is definitely propaganda, but it gives some huge insight into the methodology of early fascists.
>Reflections on Violence
Sorel was a syndicalist, but Hitler ate this shit up (Reflections on Violence, I mean), so VERY recommended.
>>7364294
Houston Stewart Chamberlain was the son-in-law of Richard Wagner and one of Hitler's mentors. Foundations was hugely influential in racialist thought. Also, this Anon is right, go ask the NatSoc/3rd Positionist boards on 8ch for more lit. Obviously use your thinking cap unless you actually want to be indoctrinated.
>>7361665
>National Socialism
>Reactionary
>>7364779
Our Savior.
>>7361975
It's reactionary, not fascist.
>>7364779
I'm back, first with some works pertaining to National Socialism as conceived in Germany. I'll organize this list into two parts: nationalism and racial theory.
>Nationalism:
>Johann Gottlieb Fichte
Early 19th C. thinker who advocated a sort of populist German nationalism. He was an idealist and a romantic who stressed German exceptionalism and a need for "purification"
>Wilhelm Heinrich Riehl, "Land and People"
Riehl was one of the early advocates of a German "blood and soil" doctrine. He's associated with the Völkisch movement, a sort of German ethnonationalism.
>Oswald Spengler
German historian and philosopher who wrote "Decline of the West" and also supported "blood and soil" type thinking. He also supported the view of the state or society as an organism, a view common to many fascist states.
>Georg Ritter von Schönerer
Austrian and pan-German nationalist who was hugely influential on young Hitler.
>German unification of 1871
You might want to check out something on 19th C Völkisch movements and pan-German nationalism which led to the unification of Germany in 1871. It's important to note that Austria was not absorbed into Germany at this time. Pay attention to Bismarck especially - Hitler described himself as the second coming of Bismarck in Mein Kamf.
>Racial theory:
>Social Darwinism/scientific racism
You should have a decent understanding of genetics and evolution in order to understand why 19th C scientists would use these theories to support racist ideologies.
>Karl Lueger
Mayor of Vienna whose anti-Semitic Christian Social Party influenced Hitler as a boy
>"Hereditary Genius" by Sir Frances Galton
Galton is considered the father of eugenics.
>"Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races" by Arthur de Gobineau
Notable for developing the theory of Aryanism and the idea of an Aryan master race
>"The Passing of The Great Race; or, The racial basis of European history" by Madison Grant
Grant was an American anthropologist who advocated the idea of a supreme Nordic race and argued in favor of Eugenics
>The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
A forgery created under the orders of the Russian tsar in the beginning of the 20th C in order to discredit Zionist Jews living in that country. Hitler took the Protocols as fact and it strengthened his hatred of the Jews.
It might also be worth looking into Romanticism and philosophers such as Nietzsche to better understand some of the ideas that influenced Hitler and the NSDAP. Well, I hope this helps a bit.
>>7361665
Lmao at this bait chart. Beowulf, The Waste Land, Tolkien, and a Lovecraft horror story are reactionary... right.
>>7361977
Actually, don't all races except humans decay over time until they are extinct? I recall that elves were on a downward spiral since the First Age, or something.
>>7366625
I crie for da elfs
>>7366631
Even Bloom Senpai realizes elf lives matter! :o
>>7361665
>Chartism
top kek
>>7362163
would you consider Dostoevsky reactionary?
>>7368240
He considers himself reactionary. Read diary of the writer.
>>7361218
Those are all good choices. I wouldn't consider Celine reactionary though. He is first a stylist who happens to have misanthropic tendencies.
>>7368261
>3 multi-page monologues about how the Enlightenment philosophers and their followers should have stayed hope and not talk to the People in one book
Come on anon, he wasn't right-wing in the modern sense, but he was clearly a reactionary both as a person and sometimes as a writer
>I believe in a different Family Code [. . .].[8] A genuine code, which would include everything, beasts, goods, and people, children and elderly of France, in the same family, excluding Jews of course, one family, one father, dictatorial and respected. Therefore a respectable family where there would really be no more bastards, Cinderellas, neglected gingers, children’s penal colonies, or “Social Services,” where the soup would be the same for all, where there would be no favorites or rich kids, no chubby ones or little skinny ones, some having fun, others bending over. [. . .] Everyone in the same school! The families united, in short, all the families into one family, with equality of resources, of rights, of brotherhood, everyone having the national salary, on the order of 150 francs per day maximum [. . .]. Everything needs to be remade? Well then perfect! But [. . .] we must start everything over from childhood, through childhood, for all children. It is through this that racism begins and genuine communism too, through childhood and nothing else, through unanimous kindness, the desire that the entire family be beautiful, healthy, lively, Aryan, pure, redemptress, joyous with beauty, with strength, not only your little family, your own two, three, four brats, but the entire very French family [. . .]. Racism is family, family is equality, it’s all for one and one for all. [. . .] A common fate, no bastards, no black sheep, no stinking ones, in the same nation, the same race, no spoiled ones either, no little bosses. No more exploitation of man by man. No more wretched of the earth. [. . .] Marxism is well fucked, we are shaking up its major asset: the cold hearts of men.[9]
>>7368383
you are now going to bump your thread on a daily basis, only because lit is slow enough?
>>7368929
Sounds fair family.
