Where is the best place to start with Derrida?
Don't.
>>7332817
>le meme feminist
>>7332817
Almost as bad as Andrea 'Slaughtering The Image of Women Everywhere' Dworkin
The interviews in Positions. Especially the interview with Kristeva. Then maybe Signature Event Context.
try the philosophy board
>>>/his/
>>7332883
ok, started a thread there
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNOXuurUODE
if you are looking for a summary
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/derrida/
The Order of Things is a good place to start if you actually wanted to read his own writting
>>7332961
The order of things is Foucault, but I forgive you
>>7332982
whoops
http://www.amazon.com/Writing-Difference-Jacques-Derrida/dp/0226143295
>>7332883
>that thread
Theres like two direct answers here and its still more worthwhile than that shitfest.
This is fucking terrible
>>>/his/162948
>>7332876
I second this
anywhere
>>7332746
Derrida is the definition of a hack.
>>7332746
The trashcan
>>7333399
Nice digits but you're wrong or you have not invested enough time in Derrida.Derrida makes interesting points but the way he gets to those points is quite a chore.
>>7333194
at least it got more replies
of grammatology
>>7333545
that's not what one should want from a thread, friend
>>7333545
More shit is not a good thing
Why do you treat him like this?
>>7332817
Are funny Camille Paglie names the dankest meme on the internet?
>>7332746
>start
>Derrida
>in the same sentence
>>7333885
>>>/trash/
>>7333850
They only like her because she's a feminist and a woman who says things they agree with. Same with CH Sommers
>>7333393
preach
Daily reminder that Critical Theory and deconstructionism are poison.
http://pjmedia.com/eddriscoll/2015/11/02/michael-walsh-interview/
>>7335166
>How leftism made 20th century classical music virtually unlistenable.
kek
>>7335570
The funniest part is that Schoenberg was a conservative and ardent monarchist.
>>7335166
>implying any of those effects are negative for the individual
top kek
I am skeptical about this guy. I remember reading an interview with a friend of Foucalt. He said that Foucalt wrote abstrusely to appeal to a french audience, but he was not like Derrida. I thought this made Derrida sound pretty bad.
>>7335595
They're probably referring to garbage in the vein of New Complexity.
>>7335607
Yes they're referring to a fringe movement people barely know even in academia
>>7335603
I don't want to disparage someone I haven't read, but I am just a little bit nervous.
>>7335654
im pretty sure thats lacan
Lotta butthurt structuralists in this thread, it seems.
>>7335166
>Gnoticism teaches that human spirit was God, was cast to earth as a million points of light and is now trapped in the evil material. Only through the sufficient knowledge, can we return to be God. The process of being removed from God is called "alienation", a theme that should be familiar to students of Marx, even as he put a secular interpretation on it. Humanity could return to God when it achieved the perfect socialist condition.
Okaaaayyyy
>>7332746
You don't.
>>7335700
>Sometimes a joke is just a joke.
- Jung
>>7335600
Everything on that image is caustic to the mind. What are you on about?
If every individual thought those same things the world would slip into a howling wilderness. But neither of us want that. You'd rather keep those ideas to yourself because you enjoy the superiority you believe it gives you.
>>7336011
im pretty sure thats not jung
>>7336063
Yeah, it was Freud.
>>7335600
bait for the bait god
