What do you think about it?
>>7328728
I tried reading the first pages. Awfully written. It's some kind of bad-taste-o-meter if you find girls with that book on the street.
Wasn't that bad during the first few chapters until they actually hook up and then it's just annoying. I just HAD to end it/be over with it because I always need to finish what I start.
Patrician teir
>>7328728
She got RAPED in the movie. Rape culture is real.
>>7328728
Clearly a significant work in the pseudo erotica genre for sexually frustrated middle aged women and horny teen couples.
test
>>7328728
Isn't it a Twilight fanfic?
>>7329085
thats how i felt and i couldn't finish the book. I put it down after the first two chapters.
>>7328728
Shit/10
Sincerely,
/lit/
>>7330370
Correct.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLkpx8GQSAZWaHW7wC0DJoMv4qX3kSvxtb
If you don't want to subject yourself to reading it yourself, here's a reading of the original fanfic that covers about the first half. The guy is taking a break from it because he said that reading it was a greater torture than any written acts in its pages.
It's porn for housewives, of course it's trash, like those supermarket pulp novels.
That being said, it's trash cause it's porn, most porn is trash.
>>7330851
I wouldn't say it's trash solely based on the fact that it's porn. It's trash because reading it is like eating a full pack of saltines with no water. Somehow it manages to be even more bland than the source of its inspiration, which is a feat unto itself.
