Is this worth reading?
>>7319112
I don't know, is it?
if by reading you mean putting directly in le trash then absolutely
>>7319112
you might have to take one for the team, read it and tell us. i've read a lot of campbell's own work but nothing of his where he might have to choose excerpts beyond his own studies on jung's one world as a myth concept.
>>7319166
Good doubles, we'll remember.
>>7319166
just read reviews/shit online about it if you need an opinion on everything before you try it you dumb faggot
>>7319176
I think /lit/ would be a much better board if they did what you're implying they should.
>>7319112
Yes, I've read it and It's definitely worth reading.
>>7319267
Yeah, it's a bit dry at times but is definitely helpful, especially if you're into making art
It's total mystified bullshit with no other purpose then generating capeshit plots.
