>Chilcot Inquiry
>The Inquiry's final report was published on 6 July 2016. Comprising 2.6 million words in 12 volumes, plus an executive summary, a physical copy was priced at £767.[36] It was also published online.
Is this, dare I say it, a modern classic?
>>8254902
Chilcot Inquiry is the pinnacle of the liberal and libertarian society.
plenty of paper used [because liberals love books and not reading books is outrageous >muh gutenberg >muh enlightenment by reading somebody's prose] that nobody cares about and that will not have any consequences thanks to the liberal fantasy of the free thinker illustrating the glorification of the impotence of a phony reflexivity of anybody in the liberal society to get out of hedonism.
the goal of the liberals and libertarians is the make hedonism as moral and legal as possible. They thrive on the transition private->public that they consolidated, so that they can appear as worthy and dignified in one realm, in order to feel more debased in the other realm. This transition is the best means to counter boredom.
This disdain for the explicit love of hedonism in liberal societies appeared already centuries ago, when the liberalism started to become trendy.
Most people are hedonists, especially through the body, and they love to think of themselves as less materialistic hedonist than they are [while still being total hedonist), typically in turning to prayers, meditations 15 minutes a day, or in the societies designed by the liberals and libertarians, in turning towards the common good, through the normative reason since the modern rationalists where every schmuck should strive to embody the free thinker....
The fantasy of the free thinker is either the one that elucidates the role of the society on the people, like the academics in literary fields, or the one who masters the nature, like the academics int he scientific fields... Both fields serve and a financed explicitly to ease the life of the people, with some myths about ''explaining the world'', because the liberals and libertarians cling to their fantasy that if people's materialistic desire are fed, then they would at last behave according to their Human rights.
This faith in some structure to make people better (aka make people think like they think) is the most defining fantasy of the europeans. The more they fail to exhumate this structure, the more they turn to asian doctrines and try to find the structure in those philosophies. They whine that they discover that these doctrines lack the structure that they fantasize and they hardly admit that they look at them only by pure exoticism, which would feed their hedonism.
Is Tony Blair the greatest villain in all of literature?
Yes, since telephone directories became obsolete people have sought other meaningless doorstops to use literature as an excuse to parrot their political views.
>>8255137
Tony Blair is an odd villain. He's like the sacrificial lamb in a way for the vast cast of villains.
Corbyn as the Unlikely Hero was an interesting twist tho.
>>8254902
do you think literally any one will read the whole thing? even tony blair? hell, did even chilcot read the whole thing?
if it was me id write "fuck niggers" or something in the middle and see if anyone notices.
>>8255200
Corbyn's clearly the ineffectual shrew to Cameron's knight-errant, who falls victim to his hubris and desire for power
>>8254902
"The Chilcot Report is a permanent part of the Western Canon" - Harold Bloom
>>8255453
>even tony blair?
>even
lol
>>8256781
Yeah i'd prefer something with giant alien lizards too but reality is a lot more mundane.
>>8256809
>giant alien lizards
They're not giant.
>>8256886
for you
>>8256781
Tony Blair is literally one of those people though, New Labour's policy was to let in immigrants because they tended to vote for them.
>>8255141
Kek
>>8256651
youd expect that if someone writes a book about how badly you fucked up youd read it
>>8256809
oh they make an appearance. in volume 3, in a surprise twist, it turns out Dr David Kelley was killed by a Silurian
